2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-020-09656-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolio Decision Analysis for Evaluating Stakeholder Conflicts in Land Use Planning

Abstract: Urban planning typically involves multiple actors and stakeholders with conflicting opinions and diverging preferences. The proposed development plans and actions greatly affect the quality of life of the local community at different spatial scales and time horizons. Consequently, it is important for decision-makers to understand and analyse the conflicting needs and priorities of the local community. This paper presents a decision analytic framework for evaluating stakeholder conflicts in urban planning. Firs… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The framework includes various scientific tools and methodologies such as methods for elicitation of stakeholder preferences, a decision engine for strategy evaluation, mechanisms for risk analyses, a set of processes for negotiation, and a set of decision rule mechanisms and processes for combining these items. Such a framework has been shown to be useful for decision-making processes such as agenda settings and overall processes, goals, strategies, policies, sub-strategies, part-policies, understanding of consequences and effects, qualifications and sometimes quantifications of the components, negotiation protocols as well as decision rules and processes [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The framework includes various scientific tools and methodologies such as methods for elicitation of stakeholder preferences, a decision engine for strategy evaluation, mechanisms for risk analyses, a set of processes for negotiation, and a set of decision rule mechanisms and processes for combining these items. Such a framework has been shown to be useful for decision-making processes such as agenda settings and overall processes, goals, strategies, policies, sub-strategies, part-policies, understanding of consequences and effects, qualifications and sometimes quantifications of the components, negotiation protocols as well as decision rules and processes [24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another component is a decision analytical tool for evaluating the multi-stakeholder decision problem, allowing to make preference assessments. One of the problems with standard methods is that numerically precise information is seldom available and most decision-makers experience difficulties with entering realistic information [24,25]. There have been many suggestions for handling the requirements for decision-makers to provide precise information, such as approaches based on capacities, sets of probability measures, upper and lower probabilities, interval probabilities and utilities, evidence and possibility theories, as well as fuzzy measures [34][35][36][37].…”
Section: Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the agricultural planting structure in my country is complex and diverse, the fields are fragmented, the mixed pixel phenomenon is serious, and the fragmentation of the fields and other factors will also affect the classification accuracy of remote sensing. The accurate identification of ground objects and the correct classification of land use types require high spatial resolution of remote sensing data [ 21 23 ]. On the one hand, a reasonable model is used to decompose the mixed pixels, which can improve the classification accuracy to a certain extent.…”
Section: Research Progress Of Remote Sensing Classification Based On ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effectual entrepreneurial outcomes “float and transmogrify into a variety of possibilities, many of them yet to be imagined” (Sarasvathy, 2004). In these circumstances, entrepreneurs are continually challenged to respond to the “emerging conditions” presented by dynamic and competing demands (Fasth et al , 2020) and to negotiate these demands with the entrepreneur’s own goals (Cunningham and Anderson, 2018, p. 394).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%