2016
DOI: 10.4236/ajibm.2016.64039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolio Performance Measurement: Review of Literature and Avenues of Future Research

Abstract: This study provides a review of the main measures of portfolio performance. We discuss their weaknesses and distinguish between traditional performance measures and more recent conditional performance measures. We show that the conditional approach addresses one major shortcoming of the traditional approach (risk stability assumption). Conditional measures allow expected returns and risk to vary with the state of the economy. We also propose new avenues for future research and some improvements to the existing… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results will be justified by the existence of a negative relation between the conditional beta of mutual funds and the market premium. Ferson and Warther (1996) provided two explanations for this negative relationship (Marhfor 2016). Firstly, this correlation can be explained by the emergence of new players, and therefore, new cash flows that are likely to change the composition of mutual funds and consequently to modify their exposure to risk.…”
Section: Active Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results will be justified by the existence of a negative relation between the conditional beta of mutual funds and the market premium. Ferson and Warther (1996) provided two explanations for this negative relationship (Marhfor 2016). Firstly, this correlation can be explained by the emergence of new players, and therefore, new cash flows that are likely to change the composition of mutual funds and consequently to modify their exposure to risk.…”
Section: Active Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of 5y monthly sample period was based on the observation that fund managers generally use between three and five years of monthly return data for portfolio construction and performance metric estimation (Marhfor, 2016). The authors opted for the longer-range to include more return data and embrace a greater fraction of the business cycle (the average business cycle frequency in South Africa is about seven years (Thomson & van Vuuren, 2016), so the 5y sample period encapsulates almost one full cycle).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Determining expected portfolio return (Hartono, 2013, p.387) 13. Calculating the stock performance by using Sharpe Method (Marhfor, 2016) 14. Calculating the stock performance by using Treynor Method (Marhfor, 2016) 15.…”
Section: Determining the Magnitude Of The Proportion Of Each Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculating the stock performance by using Sharpe Method (Marhfor, 2016) 14. Calculating the stock performance by using Treynor Method (Marhfor, 2016) 15. Calculating the stock performance by using Jansen Method (Tandelilin, 2010, p. 500) 16.…”
Section: Determining the Magnitude Of The Proportion Of Each Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%