2021
DOI: 10.1177/21582440211018460
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolio Returns of Islamic Indices and Stock Prices in GCC Countries: Empirical Evidence From the ARDL Model

Abstract: This study aimed to analyze four portfolio returns of Islamic indices to determine the potential of attracting investments in the Islamic Stock Price Index of the six Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Monthly data were collected from S&P Dow Jones Indices LLC reports covering the period from December 31, 2010 to December 31, 2019. The study applied the autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) method for estimation. The findings show that the S&P GCC Composite Shariah, the S&P GCC Composite Sha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, the differences in results between stock market values and returns models from testing the three hypotheses might be explained by that (a) the two models sometimes yield inconsistent results [9], (b) stock market values model is more equitable and stock market returns model has less serious problems than stock market values models [10], (c) as [4] concluded, the decline in value relevance related to stock market returns model could be explained by the volatility increasing of stock market returns within the sample period or (d) the source of the inconsistency might be just for the period (2015 -2018) in ISX. Overall, the study conducted a difference in the results between stock market values and stock market returns models in ISX as a developing market as well as those in developed market.…”
Section: Regression Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In total, the differences in results between stock market values and returns models from testing the three hypotheses might be explained by that (a) the two models sometimes yield inconsistent results [9], (b) stock market values model is more equitable and stock market returns model has less serious problems than stock market values models [10], (c) as [4] concluded, the decline in value relevance related to stock market returns model could be explained by the volatility increasing of stock market returns within the sample period or (d) the source of the inconsistency might be just for the period (2015 -2018) in ISX. Overall, the study conducted a difference in the results between stock market values and stock market returns models in ISX as a developing market as well as those in developed market.…”
Section: Regression Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in spite of that both models depend on the similar principles, their findings are occasionally incompatible [9]. The characteristics of stock market values and stock market returns models are displayed by [10] in a part of the valuation literature to appear the signification of these models in the valuation theories. Theoretically, in case of the welldeveloped valuation theories absence, stock market returns model is in the uppermost step compared with stock market values model [11].…”
Section: Stock Market Values and Returns Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Generally, the Shariah-based portfolios are viewed as small capital demonstrating growth momentum (Masih et al , 2018). Alshubiri (2021) highlights that in Gulf Cooperation Council countries’ stock markets, price appreciation in Islamic stocks depend upon portfolio diversification.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hedging and diversification strategies may be helpful in dealing with price fluctuations and risk management in case of a portfolio (Alshubiri, 2021). Thus, portfolio diversification plays a vital role in managing risk and return expectations for investors.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%