1990
DOI: 10.3928/0148-4834-19900201-04
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portfolios and RNs: An Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2001) suggest that there is a negative correlation between the use of the portfolio as an assessment tool and the honesty of entries, thereby reducing its validity and credibility as an assessment tool. Portfolios have also been criticized both for the amount of time taken to complete and assess them (Oechsle et al . 1990, Snadden et al .…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Portfoliosmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2001) suggest that there is a negative correlation between the use of the portfolio as an assessment tool and the honesty of entries, thereby reducing its validity and credibility as an assessment tool. Portfolios have also been criticized both for the amount of time taken to complete and assess them (Oechsle et al . 1990, Snadden et al .…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Portfoliosmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…How effective, then, are portfolios in the assessment of learning and competence? There is much theoretical discussion about this issue, but very little empirical research (Oechsle et al . 1990, Cayne 1995, Gerrish et al .…”
Section: Advantages and Disadvantages Of Portfoliosmentioning
confidence: 99%