Portrayal of Lobotomy in the Popular Press: 1935-1960

Abstract

This study analyzed the content of popular press articles on lobotomy between the years 1935 and 1960. Both a qualitative and quantitative analysis provided evidence that the press initially used uncritical and sensational reporting styles, with the content of articles on lobotomy becoming increasingly negative through time. The initial positive bias occurred despite opposing views in the medical community, which provided a basis for more balanced coverage. These findings support the theory that biased reporting in popular press articles may have been a factor influencing the quick and widespread adoption of lobotomy as a psychiatric treatment.

Ethical Issues Raised by Proposals to Treat Addiction Using Deep Brain Stimulation

“…A recent survey of healthcare providers involved in Canadian DBS programs identified problematic media portrayals of DBS as a leading challenge in obtaining informed consent [73]. Historical accounts of early psychosurgery suggest biased media coverage in the 1930s and 1940s may have similarly encouraged its widespread adoption as a first line treatment [1].…”

“…Some of these patients may be prepared to consider more invasive treatments that promise to "cure" their addiction. The promotion of "cures" in the media or direct to patients has prompted some families to pay large sums of money for treatment and to demand that these treatments be provided by governments [1][2][3]. History shows that the desperation for a "cure" of addiction can lead to the use of risky medical procedures before they have been rigorously tested for safety or efficacy [4,5].…”

Neuroethics: a modern context for ethics in neuroscience

“…Neuroscience research garners substantial public attention, and news coverage is an important channel in the transfer of neuroscience knowledge to the public. The history of neuroscience shows that popular depiction of science in print media has an important role in shaping ethics debates and public acceptance of biomedical innovation [56]. At the same time, communicating science to the public raises a host of ethical issues [57,58].…”

Psychosurgery, ethics, and media: a history of Walter Freeman and the lobotomy

“…7,8,35 Unfortunately, Watts did not favor the transorbital method, and this difference of opinion contributed to the end of their partnership. 8,35 Watts resisted the technique itself, Freeman's lack of sterile technique when performing it, and the idea of performing the procedure in an outpatient setting.…”