“…"The categories of univocal, equivocal, and analogical are different in kind from that of metaphor" (66), Saskice writes, without mention of my claim to show quite the opposite (Ross 1982), not only on this point but on almost every major point to which she commits herself about the linguistic phenomena of metaphor, about the cognitive process of thinking metaphorically, and, further, about analogy and meaning differentiation in general. For one thing, she approves Richard's "interanimation" notion of metaphor without an account of how that happens, and holds "metaphor is a form of language use with a unity of subjectmatter and which yet draws on two (or more) sets of associations, and does so, characteristically, by involving the consideration of a model or models" (49).…”