2000
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2736(200003)37:3<225::aid-tea1>3.0.co;2-g
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Portraying Science Accurately in Classrooms: Emphasizing Open-Mindedness Rather Than Relativism

Abstract: Constructivist science education typically presents a relativist image of scientific knowledge that is not shared by scientists. Truth and time are defined differently by scientists than by postmodern observers of science; a theoretical definition of truth is often applied to scientific knowledge within science education, whereas a practical definition, supported by evidence, is used within science. Similarly, time is sometimes taken out of context within science education when scientific concepts that have de… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
23
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As we believe science is most commonly portrayed as the former, we focus here on the latter and suggest educating the artist within young scientists. It is common for the science education community to suggest doing science as those within the discipline do, to be more faithful to the discipline of science, and to do and learn as scientists do (see Harding & Hare, 2000 for a recent discussion). If we really believe this, then, we should listen to what the creative process of science suggests and work to foster powerful, transformative, forward-looking, aesthetic, synscientific experiences within students.…”
Section: Beauty and Inspiration In Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As we believe science is most commonly portrayed as the former, we focus here on the latter and suggest educating the artist within young scientists. It is common for the science education community to suggest doing science as those within the discipline do, to be more faithful to the discipline of science, and to do and learn as scientists do (see Harding & Hare, 2000 for a recent discussion). If we really believe this, then, we should listen to what the creative process of science suggests and work to foster powerful, transformative, forward-looking, aesthetic, synscientific experiences within students.…”
Section: Beauty and Inspiration In Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Embora o interesse pelas concepções de NdC relacionadas à educação básica seja essencial, dado os objetivos do ensino de ciências, a compreensão de ciência em outros níveis de ensino não pode ser deixada de lado. Investigar as concepções de NdC de estudantes de cursos de bacharelado e de cientistas é relevante pois permite detectar o modo como esse grupo enxerga a construção do conhecimento e como certos mitos podem estar enraizados também no ambiente acadêmico (Feldman, Divoll, & RoganKlyve, 2013;Harding & Hare, 2000).…”
Section: Quais As Características Dos Trabalhos Sobre Concepções De Ndc?unclassified
“…While interest in conceptions of NOS related to elementary education is essential, given the objectives of science education, the understanding of science at other levels of education cannot be overlooked. The act of surveying the NOS conceptions among undergraduate students and scientists is relevant because it enables us to detect how this group views the construction of knowledge, and how certain myths can also be rooted in the academic setting (Feldman, Divoll, & Rogan-Klyve, 2013, Harding & Hare, 2000. The countries in which conceptions of NOS are more commonly studied (among different audiences, textbooks/teaching material) are the United States and Taiwan (Table 4).…”
Section: What Are the Characteristics Of Articles On Nos Conceptions?mentioning
confidence: 99%