“…The RDAS is well established, and has acceptable ratings of validity (content, construct, and criterion validity as measured through significant correlations and factor analytic methods, see original article: Busby et al., ) and reliability (α = .90, r SH = .95, r SHG = .94). In addition, the RDAS has been validated and used across cultures (e.g., Hollist et al., ; Isanezhad et al., ), in medical settings as a measure of relationship adjustment and strength in the face of life‐threatening illness (e.g., Kazemi‐Saleh, Pishgou, Assari, & Tavallaii, ; McLean et al., ), and in meta‐analytic and comparative studies of efficacy (e.g., Crane, Middleton, & Bean, ; Wood, Crane, Schaalje, & Law, ).…”