2009 IEEE 12th International Conference on Computer Vision 2009
DOI: 10.1109/iccv.2009.5459303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Poselets: Body part detectors trained using 3D human pose annotations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
757
1
2

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 827 publications
(761 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
757
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our approach is different from this algorithm in: (1) the type of local descriptors (HOG descriptors on patches vs. boundary fragments or SIFT descriptors on interest points); (2) the usage of alphabet graphemes (strong detectors vs. weak detectors); and (3) the manner of hypothesis verification (string matching vs. Adaboost classifier). Similar to our work, Andriluka et al [1] and Bourdev et al [5,4] learn partbased models to detect people in natural scenes. However, the part prototypes in their algorithms are obtained using detailed annotations of body parts, while in our model the part prototypes are inferred automatically without part annotations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Our approach is different from this algorithm in: (1) the type of local descriptors (HOG descriptors on patches vs. boundary fragments or SIFT descriptors on interest points); (2) the usage of alphabet graphemes (strong detectors vs. weak detectors); and (3) the manner of hypothesis verification (string matching vs. Adaboost classifier). Similar to our work, Andriluka et al [1] and Bourdev et al [5,4] learn partbased models to detect people in natural scenes. However, the part prototypes in their algorithms are obtained using detailed annotations of body parts, while in our model the part prototypes are inferred automatically without part annotations.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…The learned part prototypes are tightly clustered in both appearance and configuration space (Fig. 2 (b)), which are very much in common with poselets [5,4]. However, different from poselets, which are obtained using manually labeled part regions and keypoints, our part prototypes are automatically learned using human bounding boxes.…”
Section: Part Alphabet Generationmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the image domain, Random Forests have been introduced for human body pose classification [11]. Finally, the combination of holistic and part-based methods has been explored by introducing the concept of Poselets [27] in the pictorial structures framework [2,28]. These approaches have proposed an intermediate representation but they still do not capture the whole anatomy of the human body.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%