1999
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.5450770210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Position and velocity of a large particle in a gas/solid riser using the radioactive particle tracking technique

Abstract: The flow behavior of the solids phase in the fully developed region of a laboratory-scale circulating fluidized bed riser was studied using an assembly of sixteen NaI detectors to determine the position of a 500 pm radioactive particle, 100 timeds. The particle location was inferred from the number of y-rays recorded by the assembly. The knowledge of the instantaneous positions enabled the determination of the instantaneous and mean velocity fields. Tests were conducted in a 0.082 m diameter, 7 m tall riser us… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
22
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is to be expected as the turbulence in riser flows is proved to be anisotropic [3]. The anisotropy could be attributed to the length to diameter ratio of the riser that is much larger than unity, implying that the axial a) b) measurements in riser flows [3][4]8]. This observation implies that the instantaneous radial and azimuthal particle velocities exhibit a rather broad distribution of slightly positive and slightly negative values, which result in very low mean values upon averaging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is to be expected as the turbulence in riser flows is proved to be anisotropic [3]. The anisotropy could be attributed to the length to diameter ratio of the riser that is much larger than unity, implying that the axial a) b) measurements in riser flows [3][4]8]. This observation implies that the instantaneous radial and azimuthal particle velocities exhibit a rather broad distribution of slightly positive and slightly negative values, which result in very low mean values upon averaging.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The development of theoretical models and empirical equations to simulate the riser flow suffer from this lack of relevant experimental data, e.g. in view of model validation and refinement [3][4]. Furthermore, the majority of the available experimental data for two-phase riser flow provides at its best two simultaneously measured solids velocity components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the radial autocorrelation, the profile dips below zero, then oscillates to a stationary value of zero due to the wall limitation of x direction. For the direction of flow, the autocorrelation coefficient simply decayed exponentially, corresponding to Roy et al (2005) in a liquid-solid system and Godfroy et al (1999) in a gas-solid riser. Fig.…”
Section: Turbulent Dispersion Coefficients Calculationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The dispersion coefficients in the radial and axial directions are expressed as in Hinze (1959) and Godfroy et al (1999), as follows:…”
Section: Turbulent Dispersion Coefficients Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%