2009
DOI: 10.1109/joe.2009.2022578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Position Correction Using Echoes From a Navigation Fix for Synthetic Aperture Sonar Imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a bold step forward, the Norwegian Defence group [58] have installed a side looking sonar built by Edgetech (Model 4400) that is SAS capable on their HUGIN 1000 AUV and with the Dutch group have shown some promising results [59]. Just over the border a Swedish group based at Chalmers University put together several experiments to test the along-track resolu-Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics Gough et al: SAS History tion and path estimation and compensation algorithms [60][61][62][63][64]. Much of the work reported involved collaboration across agency and even national borders.…”
Section: The Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a bold step forward, the Norwegian Defence group [58] have installed a side looking sonar built by Edgetech (Model 4400) that is SAS capable on their HUGIN 1000 AUV and with the Dutch group have shown some promising results [59]. Just over the border a Swedish group based at Chalmers University put together several experiments to test the along-track resolu-Proceedings of the Institute of Acoustics Gough et al: SAS History tion and path estimation and compensation algorithms [60][61][62][63][64]. Much of the work reported involved collaboration across agency and even national borders.…”
Section: The Presentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many complementary PNT sensors have been analyzed and evaluated by the community, including light detection and ranging (LIDARs), radars, electro-optical/infra-red (EO/IR) cameras, barometers, magnetometers, and many others. [2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Each of these sensors has advantages as well as different phenomena which limit their operation. For example, optical sensors could be obstructed by cloud cover or weather, whereas radio frequency (RF) sensors can penetrate cloud cover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of the navigation of the ranging sonar SLAM depends on its transducer quality, operating frequency, and altitude from the seafloor. For the imaging sonar SLAM, the type of sonar used includes a side-scan sonar (SSS) [55][56][57][58], forward-look sonar (FLS) [59], synthetic aperture sonar (SAS) [60,61], and mechanical scanned imaging sonar (MSIS) [62][63][64]. Unlike the ranging sonar SLAM, which yields 2.5-D bathymetric features (bathymetry elevation map), the image sonar SLAM produces a 2D imagery, and the performance of the former is much better than that of the latter [28,51].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%