1988
DOI: 10.1063/1.1139924
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Position sensitive detectors in (e,2e) coincidence measurements

Abstract: The two outgoing electrons from (e,2e) scattering processes are selected by two 180° electrostatic analyzers whose energy dispersed output spectra are detected by microchannel plates followed by resistive anodes. These detectors permit the identification of all multiple coincident events occurring within the dispersal width of the analyzers. It was found that the time difference between the two detectors for correlated events is strongly dependent on the energy of the incident electrons, which consequently cau… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is usually accomplished by reducing the coincidence time window (AT). Schemes have recently been put forward to deal with the variation in flight times of electrons through electric-deflection energy analyzers (Volker and Sandner, 1983;Best and Zhu, 1985;Hayes et aL, 1988;Lower and Weigold, 1989). Fast rise-time amplifiers and constantfraction discriminators can be used to reduce electronic time dispersion.…”
Section: Coincidence Techniques and Signal-to-noise Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is usually accomplished by reducing the coincidence time window (AT). Schemes have recently been put forward to deal with the variation in flight times of electrons through electric-deflection energy analyzers (Volker and Sandner, 1983;Best and Zhu, 1985;Hayes et aL, 1988;Lower and Weigold, 1989). Fast rise-time amplifiers and constantfraction discriminators can be used to reduce electronic time dispersion.…”
Section: Coincidence Techniques and Signal-to-noise Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As many as 49 points on the momentum density can be measured at once. Weigold and co-workers (Cook, McCarthy, Stelbovics, and Weigold, 1984;Cook, Mitroy, and Weigold, 1984;Lower and Weigold, 1989;Weigold, 1990) and Williams and his collaborators (Hayes et aL, 1988) have taken a different approach by developing a multiplexed apparatus that permits an entire binding energy spectrum to be observed at a single value of momentum. This apparatus uses two spherical, electrostatic-deflection-type energy analyzers in a symmetric-noncoplanar geometry.…”
Section: E Multiplexed Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…II E. The distribution of random events is uniform and we have found no need for a noise antenna to remove electrical pickup. 30,31 For each coincident event the TAC output, ⌬t, and the (x,y) coordinates from both detectors are digitized and stored. In the subsequent analysis, radial filtering is applied to remove the electrons outside the sharp image ͑see Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spectrum shows coincidence counts as a function of t 1 − t 2 , where t 1 and t 2 , respectively, represent arrival times for electrons comprising each coincident electron pair, after correction has been made for the electron energy-dependent flight-time variations through the analyzers. 3,44 Evident is a prominent peak ͑2.9 ns FWHM͒, corresponding to electrons derived from common ionization events, superimposed on a background due to electrons derived from separate ionization events. Subtraction of these background events is performed in software using standard statistical techniques.…”
Section: -13mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reductions in timing resolution degrade the statistical quality of acquired ͑e ,2e͒ data due to increased levels of measured background. 3 While the recorded electron arrival positions can be used to correct for the energydependent variation of flight times through the analyzer, 3,44 no correction can be made for the variations in the trajectories of electrons of the same entrance energy E a but different entrance angles ␣ a , as they focus to the same location on the detector.…”
Section: Timing Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%