2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2003.11.299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Position-sensitive transition edge sensor modeling and results

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Position Sensitive TESs (PoST) concept addresses these issues by providing both a position and an energy measurement of the absorbed x-ray. This is done by attaching a TES to either end of a chain of absorbers, ∼ 10 pixels long, and comparing the signals seen in the two TESs in order to determine the position of the absorbed x-ray [8]. Figure 6 shows a schematic of the PoST; the vertical stack of absorber, TES, and the thermal impedances in between is equivalent to a single pixel microcalorimeter.…”
Section: Position Sensitive Transition Edge Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Position Sensitive TESs (PoST) concept addresses these issues by providing both a position and an energy measurement of the absorbed x-ray. This is done by attaching a TES to either end of a chain of absorbers, ∼ 10 pixels long, and comparing the signals seen in the two TESs in order to determine the position of the absorbed x-ray [8]. Figure 6 shows a schematic of the PoST; the vertical stack of absorber, TES, and the thermal impedances in between is equivalent to a single pixel microcalorimeter.…”
Section: Position Sensitive Transition Edge Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The construction of (32 Â 32) pixel arrays is still a major challenge [6][7][8]. An alternative is to use a position-sensitive detector incorporating two or more TESs on a single absorber and using ''heat division'' as the position-sensing principle [9][10][11][12][13]. The photon energy is estimated from the sum of the TES signals and the event position is inferred from the normalised difference between the signals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%