2020
DOI: 10.1111/taja.12365
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positioning Culture within Pacific Christianities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Australian Journal of Anthropology ( TAJA ) is a fitting home for it as the journal has facilitated some of the major contributions to the discussion about rupture in the anthropology of Christianity in the last decade, as well as efforts to bring anthropology into conversation with theology. A special issue edited by Macdonald and Falck (2020) pushed the envelope of the discussion on discontinuity, calling for ‘more nuanced approaches’ for grasping ‘the complex dialectics between culture and Christianity at work’ (2020, p. 134). The specific regional focus of that collection was on ethnotheologies in Pacific Christian cultures, including Catholic ones.…”
Section: This Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Australian Journal of Anthropology ( TAJA ) is a fitting home for it as the journal has facilitated some of the major contributions to the discussion about rupture in the anthropology of Christianity in the last decade, as well as efforts to bring anthropology into conversation with theology. A special issue edited by Macdonald and Falck (2020) pushed the envelope of the discussion on discontinuity, calling for ‘more nuanced approaches’ for grasping ‘the complex dialectics between culture and Christianity at work’ (2020, p. 134). The specific regional focus of that collection was on ethnotheologies in Pacific Christian cultures, including Catholic ones.…”
Section: This Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of these observations have generated a flurry of activity for almost two decades on the nature of conversion, change and time in the anthropology of Christianity, scholarship which seeks to qualify, challenge, review or extend this conversation about rupture in different directions (e.g., Bialecki & Daswani, 2015; Chua, 2012; Coleman, 2010; Fountain, 2013; Lampe, 2010; Macdonald & Falck, 2020; McDougall, 2020). I do not have the space to survey all these fruitful studies here; instead I will briefly mention the ideas of just a few that I hope to pick up on and develop in the rest of this article.…”
Section: New Directions In Theorising Religious Changementioning
confidence: 99%