2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2014.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positioning performance analysis using RWLS algorithm based on variance estimation methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be deduced from above paragraphs that if the quality of the digital IF is low [due to the low-power (non-destructive) jamming or due to the non-perfect jamming mitigation], then the positioning accuracy will be decreased. Moreover, movement of the GPS receiver can reduce positioning accuracy [24][25][26][27]. Hence, the improvement of positioning accuracy should be considered in the anti-jamming systems.…”
Section: Jamming Effects On Gps Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It can be deduced from above paragraphs that if the quality of the digital IF is low [due to the low-power (non-destructive) jamming or due to the non-perfect jamming mitigation], then the positioning accuracy will be decreased. Moreover, movement of the GPS receiver can reduce positioning accuracy [24][25][26][27]. Hence, the improvement of positioning accuracy should be considered in the anti-jamming systems.…”
Section: Jamming Effects On Gps Receivermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The secondary effect of the jamming (positioning accuracy degradation) is considered in few references [4]. It must be noted that this effect is more critical in kinematic GPS receivers, which the positioning accuracy is also degraded due to the movement of the receiver [24][25][26][27]. Hence, positioning accuracy improvement should be considered in the anti-jamming systems, which are designed for kinematic applications.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Accurate positioning and parameter estimation in such dynamic stress is very challenging [4]. The methods presented so far, including the differential positioning, use of auxiliary tools and combination with other navigation systems, are either not sufficiently accurate at such speeds or have high complexity and implementation costs [5,6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the knowledge of signal propagation time between the transmitter and the receiver can determine the distance between the transmitter and this receiver. This time is measured by the cross-correlation between the replica of the Pseudo-Random Noise code (PRN), Clear /Acquisition code (C/A) or Precision code (P), generated by the receiver and the PRN code transmitted by the satellites (Mosavi and Rahemi, 2015). In current propagation conditions, a number of phenomena lead to errors in the pseudo range.…”
Section: Pseudo Range Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%