2018
DOI: 10.1002/tesj.432
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positioning teachers, positioning learners: Why we should stop using the term English learners

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although TESOL scholars (e.g., Colombo, Tigert, & Leider, 2018; Menard‐Warwick, 2008; Miller, 2010) have used positioning theory to examine the discursive formation of learner agency and identity, Kayi‐Aydar and Miller (2018) rightfully note that many studies have narrowly focused on micro‐level positioning and neglected macro‐level positioning—or the contexts and discourse that extends beyond the moment to moment (see also Anderson, 2009; Martin‐Beltrán, 2010). Our study responds to this call by exploring positioning across multiple contexts and data sources across time, and draws upon research that has applied a positioning theoretical lens to narrative‐based research (Bamberg, 1997; Deppermann, 2013; Wortham, 2000).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although TESOL scholars (e.g., Colombo, Tigert, & Leider, 2018; Menard‐Warwick, 2008; Miller, 2010) have used positioning theory to examine the discursive formation of learner agency and identity, Kayi‐Aydar and Miller (2018) rightfully note that many studies have narrowly focused on micro‐level positioning and neglected macro‐level positioning—or the contexts and discourse that extends beyond the moment to moment (see also Anderson, 2009; Martin‐Beltrán, 2010). Our study responds to this call by exploring positioning across multiple contexts and data sources across time, and draws upon research that has applied a positioning theoretical lens to narrative‐based research (Bamberg, 1997; Deppermann, 2013; Wortham, 2000).…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Credited for coining the term, Skutnabb-Kangas (1988, 2015) posited people who speak non-dominant languages (e.g., speaking languages other than English in the United States) or registers of the dominant language that are considered non-standardized or unduly accented typically encounter harsh judgement, discrimination, and oppression. The term, emergent bi/multilingual learner , is derived from the work of Otheguy et al (2015) and Colombo et al (2019) and supported by the work of Gerald (2022) by attempting to counter the deficit models and oppressive dynamics surrounding teaching adult EBLs, challenge both linguicism and the hegemony of English, especially in English-dominant countries, and acknowledge and leverage students’ full linguistic repertoires. Similarly, the use of acquiring a new or additional language affirms that many adult EBLs are bi- or multilingual before beginning their English-language studies.…”
Section: Positionality and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…She argued that this inequitable access is usually “multicausal,” with language intersecting with other oppressive dynamics like racism, sexism, and xenophobia, which, in turn, affirmed the use of intersectionality theory in this study. The term, EBL , is inspired and affirmed by the work of Otheguy et al (2015) and Colombo et al (2019) and attempts to counter the pervasive deficit models in educational contexts in the United States surrounding adults learning English as an additional language, challenge both linguicism and the hegemony of English, especially in English-dominant countries, and acknowledge and leverage students’ full linguistic repertoires. Similarly, the use of acquiring a new or additional language affirms that many adult EBLs are bi- or multilingual before beginning their English-language studies.…”
Section: Positionality and Terminologymentioning
confidence: 99%