Positive and Negative Interactions with Humans Concurrently Affect Vervet Monkey (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) Ranging Behavior

Abstract

Many nonhuman primates adjust their behavior and thrive in human-altered habitats, including towns and cities. Studying anthropogenic influences from an animal's perspective can increase our understanding of their behavioral flexibility, presenting important information for human-wildlife cohabitation management plans. Currently, research on anthropogenically disturbed wildlife considers either positive or negative aspects of human-wildlife encounters independently, highlighting a need to consider potential interactions between both aspects. Vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus) are a suitable species to address this gap in research as they tolerate urbanization; however, they are understudied in urban landscapes. We conducted this study in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa, where vervet monkeys are commonly found throughout the anthropogenic landscape. Here we determined, from a monkey's perspective, how the frequency and nature of human-monkey interactions, both positive (human food availability) and negative (human-monkey aggression), affected vervet monkey ranging patterns in an urban environment. We assessed the movement patterns of three groups of urban vervet monkeys over 1 year, analyzing both 95% and 50% kernel density estimates of their home ranges alongside daily path lengths and path sinuosities every month using generalized linear mixed models. Overall, we found that human interactions within the urban landscape affected all measures of ranging to some degree. The core home ranges of vervet monkeys increased with a higher rate of positive human encounters, and their total home range increased with an interaction of both positive and negative human encounters. Furthermore, vervet monkeys were less likely to respond (i.e., increase daily path length or path sinuosity) to human aggression when food rewards were high, suggesting that effective management should focus on reducing human food foraging opportunities. Our results highlight the complex interplay between positive and negative aspects of urban living and provide guidance for managers of human-nonhuman primate interactions.

Time budgets and activity patterns of the southern gelada (Theropithecus gelada obscurus) in a human‐modified landscape, Wollo, Ethiopia

“…Studying the activity time budgets and daily activity patterns of animals help to understand their life history, ecological adaptation and plasticity in response to changing environments (Abu et al, 2018; El Alami et al, 2012; Jonsson & Afton, 2006; Thatcher et al, 2019a; Wright et al, 2010; Zhou et al, 2007). Animals have to deal on a daily basis with the challenge of balancing the time allocated into all the activities necessary for their self‐maintenance (Dunbar, 1992).…”

Commuters: a waterbird provides a new view of how species may utilize cities and wildlands

“…Outside of the waterbird clade, which has been recognized for its extraordinary tolerance of urban habitats (Callaghan et al 2019), commuter patterns are evidenced in other vertebrates that share waterbirds' abilities to efficiently travel long distances and maintain large home ranges, including raptors (Falco spp. (Kettel et al 2018), Stephanoaetus coronatus (Muller et al 2020)), monkeys (Chlorocebus pygerythrus (Patterson et al 2019, Thatcher et al 2019)), bears (Urus spp. (Beckmann & Berger 2003, Bateman & Fleming 2012) and wolves and coyotes (Lupus spp.…”

Understanding foraging flexibility in urban vervet monkeys, Chlorocebus pygerythrus, for the benefit of human-wildlife coexistence

“…The estate has other anthropogenic leisure developments including restaurants and leisure facilities. The estate encourages wildlife research to help biodiversity management plans (Thatcher et al 2018(Thatcher et al , 2019aPatterson et al 2019). Residents had mixed responses to vervet monkey presence ranging from actively encouraging vervet proximity to humans (intentional feeding by humans) to actively deterring vervet monkeys from human property (human aggression).…”