2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive deviance in health and medical research on individual level outcomes – a review of methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 115 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the none-probability sampling methods used to recruit participants [ 94 ] and the Hawthorne effect, a type of reactivity in which individuals modify an aspect of their behavior in response to their awareness of being observed as positive deviant are included in many articles as limitations in using the approach of PD [ 30 , 32 , 49 , 66 , 71 ]. These limitations highlight the need for careful consideration of a balanced method when using the PD approach [ 146 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In addition, the none-probability sampling methods used to recruit participants [ 94 ] and the Hawthorne effect, a type of reactivity in which individuals modify an aspect of their behavior in response to their awareness of being observed as positive deviant are included in many articles as limitations in using the approach of PD [ 30 , 32 , 49 , 66 , 71 ]. These limitations highlight the need for careful consideration of a balanced method when using the PD approach [ 146 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In line with the above findings, another scoping review paper has indicated that some researchers have used unstandardized and less clear criteria to select PDs and suggested that objective measures of health outcomes should be used whenever possible to reduce the possibility of bias in examining associations [ 146 ]. Furthermore, it is critical to consider the underlying assumption that the identified PDs are contextually comparable with other groups in terms of access to resources and expertise [ 20 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the present study, we used criterion sampling to identify positively deviant adult (>18 years) DR-TB patients who had successfully completed DR-TB treatment without interruption for ≥2 consecutive days. Positive deviants referred to individuals who stand out from their peers in terms of dealing with the challenges they face in common and have better outcome than their peers [ 16 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%