“…As shown in Table , according to the quality assessment for the selected studies using QATFQS, no study was evaluated as a strong study. The majority of the studies were weak (Ando, Natsume, Kukihara, Shibata, & Ito, ; Bazarko, Cate, Azocar, & Kreitzer, ; dos Santos et al, ; Duarte & Pinto‐Gouveia, , ; Hee, Pathmawati, Norsiah, & Phang, ), with some studies evaluated as moderate quality (Mackenzie, Poulin, & Seidman‐Carlson, ; Pipe et al, ; Wylde, Mahrer, Meyer, & Gold, ). The reason for these results is related to two items, the selection bias and confounders, which were the most common weaknesses.…”