2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2020.09.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive fluid balance was associated with mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure: A cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, a restrictive fluid management was associated with a lower mortality compared to liberal fluid administration (24.7 vs. 33.2%; p < 0.0001) [6]. Similarly, in a cohort of critically ill patients with cirrhosis, a higher median fluid balance 7 days post-ICU admission (+13.50 vs. +6.90 L; p = 0.036) was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality [7]. Interestingly, a recent clinical trial demonstrated that restrictive fluid management strategy is safe in patients with septic shock compared to standard care (i.e., liberal strategy); although the outcome was not superior in the restrictive group, it is notable that the standard care group received substantially less fluid compared to prior studies (a median of 3.8 L) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Moreover, a restrictive fluid management was associated with a lower mortality compared to liberal fluid administration (24.7 vs. 33.2%; p < 0.0001) [6]. Similarly, in a cohort of critically ill patients with cirrhosis, a higher median fluid balance 7 days post-ICU admission (+13.50 vs. +6.90 L; p = 0.036) was associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality [7]. Interestingly, a recent clinical trial demonstrated that restrictive fluid management strategy is safe in patients with septic shock compared to standard care (i.e., liberal strategy); although the outcome was not superior in the restrictive group, it is notable that the standard care group received substantially less fluid compared to prior studies (a median of 3.8 L) [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Therefore, respiratory complications might be a major reason for the hesitation of clinicians to place mechanically ventilated patients on waiting lists for liver transplantation 2 . However, the appropriate management of respiratory complications in patients with severe LF remains obscure, although there are reports in the literature regarding possible clinical management options 2,11–18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 However, the appropriate management of respiratory complications in patients with severe LF remains obscure, although there are reports in the literature regarding possible clinical management options. 2,[11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] This study was conducted with an aim to evaluate the management and treatment outcomes of patients with LF, especially those who needed mechanical ventilation therapy and are admitted to the general ICU.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2017 alone, heart failure admissions occurred at a rate of approximately 5 per 1000 United States adults with about a quarter of those patients experiencing readmissions, which highlights the magnitude of this problem[ 3 ]. The deleterious effects of fluid overload are now being recognized outside of heart failure, with multiple studies showing a positive fluid balance being associated with increased mortality[ 4 , 5 ]. Though seemingly straightforward, evaluation and management of congestion require a thorough understanding of the pathophysiology and hemodynamic principles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%