2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.02.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive hepatitis E and Epstein Barr virus serology in a patient with jaundice after travel

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6), whereas they have been previously described as becoming negative 2–3 months following hepatitis onset in most cases [Takahashi et al, 2005; Bendall et al, 2008]. The low (≤5.5) ODR observed may also argue for false positive results, which have been described previously in association with primary Epstein–Barr Virus infection [Tappe et al, 2010]. Nevertheless, the specificity of the anti‐HEV IgM assay used in the present study was reported to be 100% when tested on 406 samples in France [Legrand‐Abravanel et al, 2009b].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…6), whereas they have been previously described as becoming negative 2–3 months following hepatitis onset in most cases [Takahashi et al, 2005; Bendall et al, 2008]. The low (≤5.5) ODR observed may also argue for false positive results, which have been described previously in association with primary Epstein–Barr Virus infection [Tappe et al, 2010]. Nevertheless, the specificity of the anti‐HEV IgM assay used in the present study was reported to be 100% when tested on 406 samples in France [Legrand‐Abravanel et al, 2009b].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Third, financial instability and poverty are also associated with increased risks of HEV infection [4]. The clinical symptoms of hepatitis E are typical of selflimiting, acute viral hepatitis in general [16,31]. Severe hepatitis E can occur in the elderly, pregnant women and people with chronic hepatitis B and chronic hepatitis C [11,17,32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In support of their conclusion, the authors cited literature describing the occurrence of positive values for hepatitis E IgG in hepatitis A, B and C infection and positive values for hepatitis E IgM in acute Epstein–Barr virus and cytomegalovirus infection, in the absence of concomitant hepatitis E infection. Therefore, for definitive diagnosis the authors suggest RT-PCR must be undertaken 16. This can prove difficult in a delayed presentation such as ours because the period of hepatitis E viraemia is brief – by a few days to weeks after the onset of clinical symptoms, hepatitis E viral RNA is cleared from the blood; however, it is shed in the stool for a further 2 weeks 1…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%