1997
DOI: 10.1080/10720539708404633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive-negative asymmetry and bipolar contrast

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, in experimental settings, when subjects are instructed to assign others to positive or negative personality dimensions, they tend to assign more positive than negative traits, on average 62% positive versus 38% negative. This ratio (1,6) is found repeatedly in previous research, known as the 'golden section' hypothesis in judgmental asymmetry (Adams-Webber, 1997;Rigdon & Epting, 1982). Likewise, in our study, the good fairy tale role assignments outnumber the bad ones 63 versus 37% (Table 2), that is, they approximate the 'golden section' hypothesis almost perfectly.…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Likewise, in experimental settings, when subjects are instructed to assign others to positive or negative personality dimensions, they tend to assign more positive than negative traits, on average 62% positive versus 38% negative. This ratio (1,6) is found repeatedly in previous research, known as the 'golden section' hypothesis in judgmental asymmetry (Adams-Webber, 1997;Rigdon & Epting, 1982). Likewise, in our study, the good fairy tale role assignments outnumber the bad ones 63 versus 37% (Table 2), that is, they approximate the 'golden section' hypothesis almost perfectly.…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretationsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…That the evaluations of significant others expressed by the obese group in relation to the elicited constructs, would be significantly closer to the negative poles of constructs than those expressed by the control group. It was hypothesized in other words that obese subjects would display a tendency to make systematically negative judgements, in contrast with the "natural" tendency, reported in the literature on the repertory grid, to positively value others as well as the self [45,48,52,53].…”
Section: Definition Of Significant Othersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, to evaluate Hypothesis 4, the bias index was used to measure subjects' tendency to use one pole of a construct more than the other pole [76]. The literature on RET reports a systematic tendency on the part of individuals to position other elements at the same pole of a given construct at which they have positioned themselves, which is usually the positive pole: People have been found to assign other elements to the same construct pole as themselves in 63% of cases -known as the golden section -versus the remaining 37% of cases in which they assign them to the opposite pole [52,53]. The bias index is calculated for each of the constructs elicited from the subject using the following formula:…”
Section: Grid Analysis Indicesmentioning
confidence: 99%