2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10474-019-01011-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive operators on extended second order cones

Abstract: In this paper necessary conditions and sufficient conditions are given for a linear operator to be a positive operator of an Extended Lorentz cone. Similarities and differences with the positive operators of Lorentz cones are investigated. * 2010

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

2
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By letting µ = λ * and λ = λ k in inequality (19) and by using again the definition in (17), we obtain that…”
Section: Semi-smooth Newton Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By letting µ = λ * and λ = λ k in inequality (19) and by using again the definition in (17), we obtain that…”
Section: Semi-smooth Newton Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If we allow q = 0 as well, then the cones L and M reduce to the nonnegative orthant. More properties of the extended second order cones can be found in [19,20,25].…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…≥+ and (R n ≥+ ) * , respectively, and x ⊥ y. As Au i , v j = 0, by considering the derivation of equations ( 9), (10), (11) and (12) in the reverse order, equation (13) implies that Ax, y = 0. Hence, A ∈ LL(R n ≥+ ).…”
Section: Therefore (X U Y V) ∈ C(l) Hence S ⊆ C(l)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are several known important versions of the extended Lorentz cone, including Bishop-Phelps cone [5] and the extended second-order cone (ESOC), which was recently developed by S. Z. Németh and his co-authors, see [10][11][12][13][14]. The Lyapunov rank of a cone K , denoted by β(K ) (see its definition in the next section) is an invariant which shows that the Lorentz cone and ESOC are generally not linearly isomorphic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%