1999
DOI: 10.1093/humrep/14.9.2191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive outcome after preimplantation diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos *

Abstract: usromosomal abnormalities are responsible for a great deal of embryo wastage, which is reflected, at least partially, in decreased implantation and increased miscarriage in older women. To address this problem the transfer of only chromosomally normal embryos previously selected by preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) has been proposed. We designed a multi-centre in-vitro fertilization (IVF) study to compare controls and a test group that underwent embryo biopsy and PGD for aneuploidy. Patients were matched… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
150
0
6

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 357 publications
(158 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
2
150
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Many investigators have attempted to achieve this goal, but to date, these studies either have design flaws or have been contradictory in their results. 51,52,54,55 A recent meta-analysis by Twisk et al, 56 which included 2 randomized controlled trials, did not find a statistically significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (15% in PGS versus 20% in controls) or live birth rate (11% in PGS versus 15% in controls). Mastenbroek et al 57 published in 2007 a large, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded trial demonstrating that PGS with a 1-cell biopsy using FISH analysis in women between 35 to 41 years not only did not improve but instead significantly reduced the ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates after IVF.…”
Section: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screeningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Many investigators have attempted to achieve this goal, but to date, these studies either have design flaws or have been contradictory in their results. 51,52,54,55 A recent meta-analysis by Twisk et al, 56 which included 2 randomized controlled trials, did not find a statistically significant difference in the clinical pregnancy rate (15% in PGS versus 20% in controls) or live birth rate (11% in PGS versus 15% in controls). Mastenbroek et al 57 published in 2007 a large, multicenter, randomized, double-blinded trial demonstrating that PGS with a 1-cell biopsy using FISH analysis in women between 35 to 41 years not only did not improve but instead significantly reduced the ongoing pregnancy and live birth rates after IVF.…”
Section: Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis and Screeningmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because the chromosomal content of the blastomeres that were not sampled is inferred from the chromosomal content of the single cell that was, false positive and false negative results are frequent. Although removing a second blastomere at the time of sampling may improve accuracy, this comes at the cost of decreases in embryo survival (Harper et al 1995;Delhanty 1997;Munné et al 1999;De Vos et al 2009;Harton et al 2011). A significant disadvantage of cleavage stage blastomere biopsy is the associated decrease in implantation rates for biopsied embryos (Coco 2014).…”
Section: Genetic Considerations In Recurrent Pregnancy Lossmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies up to nine different chromosomes are analysed 18 -20 and the success of ART is slightly improved. A reduction in abortions 19,20 and even an increase in implantation rate 20 has been observed, although the percentage of pregnancies has not increased. 21 Since, as reported, 90% of embryo aneuploidy is the result of nondisjunction in maternal meiosis I, 22 detection of abnormal oocytes through the analysis of their first polar body (1PB) in an in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment is an important goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%