2020
DOI: 10.15407/ujpe65.1.3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive Parity Levels of 21,23Na Isotopes by Using the Nuclear Shell

Abstract: The energy levels and transition probabilities B(E2; ↓) i B(M1; ↓) have been investigated for 21,23Na isotopes by using the (USDA and USDB) interactions in the (sd-shell) model space. In the calculations of the shell model, it has been assumed that all possible many-nucleon configurations are specified by the (0d5/2, 1s1/2 i 0d3/2) states above 16O doubly magic nucleus. The available empirical data are in a good agreement with predictions of theoretical energy levels. Spins and parities are affirmed for new le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The comparison of experimental and theoretical values of reduced M1 matrix elements, |M(M1)| = √ (2J i + 1)B(M1), is presented in Fig. 2 for transitions in 23 Mg and 21,23 Na [30]. Optimum effective g-factors USDA(6) and USDB (6) from Table I of Ref.…”
Section: Nuclear Structure Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The comparison of experimental and theoretical values of reduced M1 matrix elements, |M(M1)| = √ (2J i + 1)B(M1), is presented in Fig. 2 for transitions in 23 Mg and 21,23 Na [30]. Optimum effective g-factors USDA(6) and USDB (6) from Table I of Ref.…”
Section: Nuclear Structure Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 2. Correlation between measured and theoretical reduced matrix elements |M(M1)| values for transitions in23 Mg and21,23 Na[30]. Theoretical values were obtained from sd-shell calculations with USDAcpn and USDBcpn[25,26], experimental ones from measured (τ, E γ,0 ), resulting in rms=0.322 µ N (USDAcpn) and rms=0.273 µ N (USDBcpn).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among these models, the accomplished nuclear shell model stands out. This model identifies the energy states, their placements, and the transitions occurring between those states, thereby providing a significant portrayal of nuclear attributes [2,3]. In the realm of shell-model calculations, there are two primary components: the interaction between nucleons (N-N interaction) and the configuration space allotted for valence particles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fatema H. Obeed and Baneen S. Abed, used the surface delta and modified surface delta interactions by applying the nuclear shell model to calculate values of excitation energies for isotopes of equal mass number containing two nucleons outside the closed core 114 Sn, these nuclei are; the isotope (Tin) 116 Sn contains two neutrons within the model space (3s1/2, 2d3/2, 1h11/2) and the other isotope is 116 Te (Tellurium) contains two protons within the model space (1g7/2, 2d5/2, 3s1/2, 2d3/2, 1h11/2) [10]. A. K. Hasan et al, investigated on the energy levels and transition probabilities 𝐵 (𝐸2; ↓) and 𝐵 (𝑀1; ↓) for 21,23 Na isotopes by using the (USDA and USDB) interactions in the (𝑠𝑑-shell) model space [11]. S. Akkoyun, investigated the nuclear structure properties of A=49 isobars, the double-magic 40 Ca nucleus was considered an inert core, and fp model space was taken into account for the valance nucleons [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%