“…To the best of our knowledge, this is the first result for the case when 1 < p, q < 2, m > p and n > q, also in the case of a single equation. We recall that the cases p, q > 2, m, n > 1 and p = q = 2, m, n > 1 were treated respectively in [25] and [26], see also [21] and [22] for a system of anisotropic (p(x), q(x))-Laplacian parabolic equations, with p(x), q(x) > 2 in Ω, and m = n = 1. In the very recent paper [60], the authors replace the nonlocal terms of (1.1) by Ω K i (ξ, t)u(ξ, t)dξ, for i = 1, 3, and Ω K i (ξ, t)v(ξ, t)dξ, for i = 2, 4.…”