2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110416
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive predictive value for diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric cholesteatoma: A retrospective study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A previous study of the paediatric population revealed a trend towards smaller areas of avidity where there were false positives. 16 In our study, small areas of avidity on diffusion-weighted MRI were also seen in our false positive group (Figure 2). One study, specifically focusing on false positives in the adult population, reported that in three of the four false positive cases, areas of high avidity disappeared on subsequent imaging.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…A previous study of the paediatric population revealed a trend towards smaller areas of avidity where there were false positives. 16 In our study, small areas of avidity on diffusion-weighted MRI were also seen in our false positive group (Figure 2). One study, specifically focusing on false positives in the adult population, reported that in three of the four false positive cases, areas of high avidity disappeared on subsequent imaging.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 62%
“…A residual cholesteatoma was diagnosed in 35% (n = 112) of MRI. The mean size of the residual cholesteatoma was 5 ± 2.4 mm [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] (n = 58).…”
Section: Population: Children and Mrimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In children, however, its performance seems to be poorer and has only been described in small cohorts. The largest study so far included 55 children with a sensitivity of 76% and specificity of 90% 12‐14 . Also, the minimal size of detection of residual disease is an issue, usually set at 3 mm in diameter and requiring repeated MRI 1,15,16 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation