1975
DOI: 10.2307/2230532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive Profits with Negative Surplus Value

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
4

Year Published

1979
1979
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
27
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Since negative activity levels do not exist, this only means that in fact that even contracting these processes to zero the net output of the overabundant products would not be reduced sufficiently for the system to adjust the vector of production exactly to the vector of effectual demands -in this case, the processes in use would have to change in order to match exactly the vector of effectual demands. STEEDMAN'S "PoSITIVE PRoFITS WITH NEGATIVE SURPLUS-VALUE" PARADox Steedman (1975) seems to have taken this route and, by inverting the assumptions that Sraffa used to rule out processes with negative activity levels, produced his own particular example. The inconclusive results of the controversy sparked by his "positive profits with negative surplus value" example seem to have been due to the combination of two main factors.…”
Section: Labour Values and Joint Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since negative activity levels do not exist, this only means that in fact that even contracting these processes to zero the net output of the overabundant products would not be reduced sufficiently for the system to adjust the vector of production exactly to the vector of effectual demands -in this case, the processes in use would have to change in order to match exactly the vector of effectual demands. STEEDMAN'S "PoSITIVE PRoFITS WITH NEGATIVE SURPLUS-VALUE" PARADox Steedman (1975) seems to have taken this route and, by inverting the assumptions that Sraffa used to rule out processes with negative activity levels, produced his own particular example. The inconclusive results of the controversy sparked by his "positive profits with negative surplus value" example seem to have been due to the combination of two main factors.…”
Section: Labour Values and Joint Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paradox of positive profits and negative surplus value provided by Steedman (1975) rests on the fact that negative levels of activity would be required if the bundles were to be produced separately -or, that these bundles can only be produced jointly within this square system. of course negative activity levels do not exist.…”
Section: Labour Values and Joint Productionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In order to provide the "quantitative code" of accumulation, the labor process itself must be objective, quantifiable, and observable. Yet, as Marx himself anticipated and as the Cambridge Controversy was to later demonstrate, once we go beyond the most simple production processes these requirements no longer hold (Steedman, 1975(Steedman, , 1977Tsuru, 1993: Ch. 1).…”
Section: Capital Accumulation: Production or Power?mentioning
confidence: 99%