2017
DOI: 10.1090/tran/6992
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive solutions for super-sublinear indefinite problems: High multiplicity results via coincidence degree

Abstract: We study the periodic boundary value problem associated with the second order nonlinear equationwhere g(u) has superlinear growth at zero and sublinear growth at infinity. For λ, µ positive and large, we prove the existence of 3 m − 1 positive T -periodic solutions when the weight function a(t) has m positive humps separated by m negative ones (in a T -periodicity interval). As a byproduct of our approach we also provide abundance of positive subharmonic solutions and symbolic dynamics. The proof is based on c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
36
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Without loss of generality, we can suppose that A − (σ, t) > 0 for all t ∈ ]σ, τ ]. Indeed, it is always possible to choose a suitable σ as in (a * ) that satisfies this additional hypothesis, as pointed out in [3,7,8,21].…”
Section: Study Of Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Without loss of generality, we can suppose that A − (σ, t) > 0 for all t ∈ ]σ, τ ]. Indeed, it is always possible to choose a suitable σ as in (a * ) that satisfies this additional hypothesis, as pointed out in [3,7,8,21].…”
Section: Study Of Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, we say that a solution is positive if u(t) > 0 for all t ∈ [0, T ]. Our study is motivated by the results achieved in [1,2,3,6,7,8,10,11,14] in which, dealing with different boundary value problems compared to the one treated here, the authors established multiplicity results of positive solutions in relation to the features of the graph of the weight a(t). This way, we would like to pursue further the investigation of the dynamical effects produced by the weight term associated with nonlinearities satisfying conditions (g * ) and (g 0 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Remark 4.1. In order to clarify the derivation of formula (4.8), we now give the direct computation of the degree in the case N = 2, without using the combinatorial argument developed in [9]. As an example we compute the degree in A ∅,{1} .…”
Section: Preliminary Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…. For a general integer N one can prove formula (4.8) using the combinatorial argument in [9] or by induction using the excision property of the degree. ⊳…”
Section: Preliminary Lemmasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, following a standard terminology (cf. [6]), we can look at (1.1) as an indefinite equation, meaning that the sign of the weight is non-constant. Our main goal is to provide multiplicity results of positive solutions to equation (1.1) together with the Sturm-Liouville boundary conditions, namely conditions of the form αu(0) − βu (0) = 0 γu(L) + δu (L) = 0, (1.2) where α, β, γ, δ ≥ 0 with γβ + αγ + αδ > 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%