1978
DOI: 10.1177/155005947800900201
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positive Spikes Revisited — in the Adult

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…196 A later study showed that their presence is a sign of normal brain activity indicating a healthier brain in this group of patients. 197 As for many normal variants, this pattern was thought in the early days to be associated with various psychiatric conditions and epilepsy, 134,179,198,199 but it is now recognized as a benign EEG variant with no epileptogenic or pathologic significance.…”
Section: Rhythmic Midtemporal Theta (Bursts) Of Drowsiness (Rmtd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…196 A later study showed that their presence is a sign of normal brain activity indicating a healthier brain in this group of patients. 197 As for many normal variants, this pattern was thought in the early days to be associated with various psychiatric conditions and epilepsy, 134,179,198,199 but it is now recognized as a benign EEG variant with no epileptogenic or pathologic significance.…”
Section: Rhythmic Midtemporal Theta (Bursts) Of Drowsiness (Rmtd)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Subsequently, many electroencephalographers have positively identified this pattern in many young children in various case studies and scenarios. [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] Gibbs and Gibbs had originally coined the term 6 and 14 Hz positive spikes because the pattern comes in a frequency of either 6 or 14 Hz. 13 The term positive spikes denote spiky morphology and positive polarity at the site of origin of the pattern.…”
Section: Historical Background and Nomenclaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…When this was done they found the elevated incidence of PS among adult psychiatric admissions compared to the adult normal population to be overwhelmingly significant at all age categories (age 20-24, 27.4 vs. 8.7 %, X 2 = 31.8 , p \ 0.0000001; age 25-29, 20.9 vs. 1.3 % X 2 = 17.9, p = 0.00002; age 30-39, 13.3 vs. 0.9 %, X 2 = 14.8, p = 0.002; age 40 to 49, 7.4 vs. 0.0 %, X 2 = 6.97, p = 0.01, and age 50 to 59, 4.6 vs. 0.0 %, X 2 = 3.67, p = 0.056). In another study specifically addressing the issue of PS in an adult population (Hughes and Cayaffa 1978), 460 adults aged 30 to over 80 with PS were contrasted with a variety of comparison groups matched for age, gender, and race. Neurovegetative or psychiatric symptoms, either occurring separately or combined, were present in 85 % of the adults with PS and the authors concluded by arguing for the clinical significance of PS when encountered in the adult patient.…”
Section: Incidence In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus in adults PS frequently appear in the waking record. Hughes and Cayaffa (1978) investigated a large number of adults with PS. This study involved 460 adults from the third to the eighth decade with PS, found after screening more than 50,000 patients.…”
Section: Incidence In Adultsmentioning
confidence: 99%