2019
DOI: 10.2140/ant.2019.13.2057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positivity of anticanonical divisors and F-purity of fibers

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The above theorem is a special case of[7, Theorem 4.5] (see[7, Remark 4.7]). (2) The F -purity of the geometric generic fiber is equivalent to the F -purity of the geometric general fiber (see[28, Corollary 3.31] or [7, Lemma 2.3]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The above theorem is a special case of[7, Theorem 4.5] (see[7, Remark 4.7]). (2) The F -purity of the geometric generic fiber is equivalent to the F -purity of the geometric general fiber (see[28, Corollary 3.31] or [7, Lemma 2.3]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It is proved as a consequence of Theorems 3.1 and 3.2. 20]). Let f : X → Z be a surjective morphism from a normal projective variety X over an algebraically closed field of characteristic p > 0 to a smooth projective variety Z, and let ∆ be an effective Q-divisor on X such that a∆ is integral for some a > 0 not divisible by p. Assume that (X η , ∆ η ) is F -pure, where η is the geometric generic point of Z.…”
Section: 5mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This theorem answers another question posed in [10] that asks if the inequality in the statement of the theorem holds. Theorem 1.2 is actually proved in the case where f is an almost holomorphic map, that is, a rational map with proper general fibres (Theorem 4.2).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 79%