2015
DOI: 10.1161/circulationaha.115.018521
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Imaging in Device Infective Endocarditis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…21 Hence, although echocardiography will remain an invaluable first-line tool, complementary molecular imaging techniques may be of increasing value, especially in doubtful cases which were the focus of the present study. Besides conventional WBC scintigraphy, 18 F-FDG PET/CT has been increasingly recognized as a valuable tool in endocarditis, 22 and ESC guidelines recommend both tests in suspected but unconfirmed prosthetic valve infection. 3 Compared with FDG PET, WBC scintigraphy is thought to have lower sensitivity (owing to lower camera resolution and detection sensitivity) but higher specificity for endocarditis (owing to the more direct correlation of WBC infiltration to infection vs. the sometimes non-specific uptake of 18 F-FDG).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…21 Hence, although echocardiography will remain an invaluable first-line tool, complementary molecular imaging techniques may be of increasing value, especially in doubtful cases which were the focus of the present study. Besides conventional WBC scintigraphy, 18 F-FDG PET/CT has been increasingly recognized as a valuable tool in endocarditis, 22 and ESC guidelines recommend both tests in suspected but unconfirmed prosthetic valve infection. 3 Compared with FDG PET, WBC scintigraphy is thought to have lower sensitivity (owing to lower camera resolution and detection sensitivity) but higher specificity for endocarditis (owing to the more direct correlation of WBC infiltration to infection vs. the sometimes non-specific uptake of 18 F-FDG).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Combining FDG-PET/CT with the Modified Duke Criteria resulted in increased sensitivity with no major change in specificity [46••]. Whereas FDG-PET is unreliable in the setting of native valve endocarditis [47•], it accurately diagnoses prosthetic valve endocarditis and systemic complications of IE [47•–54]. Acknowledging this utility, in 2015 FDG-PET/CT was included in the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology as a major criterion for diagnosing IE in patients with prosthetic valves [55•].…”
Section: Endocarditismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…12 A non-invasive test with sufficient sensitivity and specificity to confirm or exclude infection in cases with a low-intermediate pre-test probability of infection at initial presentation would be valuable. Traditional management of CIED infection is reactive.…”
Section: Implications On Clinical Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,11 One particular shortcoming of the Modified Duke Criteria in suspected CIED-LI and PVE is that a significant proportion of patients remain categorized as ''possible endocarditis,'' which only perpetuates diagnostic uncertainty in already challenging cases. 12,13 In view of these limitations, there has been a drive to develop novel imaging strategies specific to cardiovascular device infection. 14 In this issue of Journal of Nuclear Cardiology, Mahmood et al report results from a meta-analysis of 14 recent studies evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of 18 F-FDG PET/CT for suspected CIED infection across the full spectrum of clinical presentations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%