2002
DOI: 10.1007/bf02574480
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positron emission tomography is superior to computed tomography for metastatic detection in melanoma patients

Abstract: PET is more sensitive and specific than CT for detection of melanoma metastasis and should be considered the primary staging study for recurrent disease. PET shows greater ability to detect soft tissue, small-bowel, and lymph node metastasis that do not meet criteria designated as abnormal by CT. PET is superior to CT even when sites not routinely evaluated by CT are excluded from comparative analysis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
43
0
3

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 122 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
43
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…15). Thus, PET/CT is playing an increasing role in the management of these patients, and has improved diagnostic accuracy for both detection of disease and treatment monitoring when compared with both conventional imaging modalities and PET alone [63][64][65]. Lymphoma and Melanoma summary below:…”
Section: Lymphoma and Melanomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15). Thus, PET/CT is playing an increasing role in the management of these patients, and has improved diagnostic accuracy for both detection of disease and treatment monitoring when compared with both conventional imaging modalities and PET alone [63][64][65]. Lymphoma and Melanoma summary below:…”
Section: Lymphoma and Melanomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6-20 Some studies suggest that FDG-PET may be more sensitive and specific than conventional diagnostic tests for detecting this disease. 13,14,17,20 However, these studies have some important limitations, which include a lack of pathologic confirmation of suspected sites of metastatic disease and a relatively short clinical follow-up. In addition, most studies have determined specificity and sensitivity on the basis of a patient-by-patient analysis instead of a lesion-by-lesion analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[7][8][9][10][11][12] Technologies such as MRI, MR spectroscopy, among others can provide functional and physiological information about skin lesions as well as information about size, depth and location. [13][14][15][16][17][18] While optical coherence tomography and other optical techniques, including elastography, show promise given their ability to provide high-resolution skin imaging and flow data, [19][20][21] they are not readily available in imaging or dermatology departments. Optical imaging can only penetrate to the level of the dermis and not to deeper structures, which is a major limitation in staging, evaluation of the extent of disease and lesion characterization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%