2013
DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20120570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positron emission tomography (PET) attenuation correction artefacts in PET/CT and PET/MRI

Abstract: Objective: To compare the effect of implanted medical materials on 18 F-fludeoxyglucose ( 18 F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)/ MRI using a Dixon-based segmentation method for MRI-based attenuation correction (MRAC), PET/CT and CT-based attenuation-corrected PET (PET CTAC ).Methods: 12 patients (8 males and 4 females; age 58611 years) with implanted medical materials prospectively underwent whole-body 18 F-FDG PET/CT and PET/MRI. CT, MRI and MRAC maps as well as PET CTAC and PET MRAC images were review… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This property is of particular relevance in PET/MR imaging because MR-based attenuation correction is generally less accurate than its PET/ CT counterpart (10-13). Not only are the attenuation coefficients a priori estimates rather than measurements, but there are also several sources of artifacts that can affect the attenuation map (14,15): field-of-view truncation, fat-water swaps, metal artifacts, and others.…”
Section: Implication For Patient Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This property is of particular relevance in PET/MR imaging because MR-based attenuation correction is generally less accurate than its PET/ CT counterpart (10-13). Not only are the attenuation coefficients a priori estimates rather than measurements, but there are also several sources of artifacts that can affect the attenuation map (14,15): field-of-view truncation, fat-water swaps, metal artifacts, and others.…”
Section: Implication For Patient Carementioning
confidence: 99%
“…MR‐based AC is still a new concept that is supposed to support PET data quantification in the best possible way. All deviations from the real physical gamma quanta attenuation will ultimately lead to false values in PET quantification following attenuation correction . Administration of contrast agents before application of MR‐based AC due to changes in contrast potentially may lead to errors in tissue segmentation .…”
Section: Workflow and Standardizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the main topics of controversy is how the attenuation correction of the PET images should be addressed (4)(5)(6). PET/CT machines provide the possibility of generating the annihilation photon attenuation map of the patient from a fast low-dose CT scan.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%