1995
DOI: 10.1071/ph950893
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positronium-Proton Scattering at Low Energies

Abstract: Calculations of low energy positronium-proton scattering using the close coupling approach are reported at energies below the three-body breakup energy of 0·5 Rydberg. The channel space includes nine physical hydrogen and positronium states and in addition twelve hydrogen and positronium pseudo-states. Total elastic and electron-transfer cross sections are reported at incident energies below the ionisation threshold. Cross sections for electron transfer to the H(n=2) and H(n=3) levels are also reported.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
26
2
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
26
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also compare the present phase shifts with those obtained by Schwartz (1961) [14] obtained by using the Kohn variational principle, Houston and Drachman (1971) [18], by using the Harris method, Kohn variational calculation of Humberston and Wallace (1972) [19], and Gien (1997) [20], by using the Harris-Nesbet method in Table 2. The 21-state close-coupling approximation phase shifts obtained by Mitroy and Ratnavelu (1995) [21][22][23] are lower than the present results. [21][22][23] has reported a large basis close-coupling calculation of scattering at low energies.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We also compare the present phase shifts with those obtained by Schwartz (1961) [14] obtained by using the Kohn variational principle, Houston and Drachman (1971) [18], by using the Harris method, Kohn variational calculation of Humberston and Wallace (1972) [19], and Gien (1997) [20], by using the Harris-Nesbet method in Table 2. The 21-state close-coupling approximation phase shifts obtained by Mitroy and Ratnavelu (1995) [21][22][23] are lower than the present results. [21][22][23] has reported a large basis close-coupling calculation of scattering at low energies.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The 21-state close-coupling approximation phase shifts obtained by Mitroy and Ratnavelu (1995) [21][22][23] are lower than the present results. [21][22][23] has reported a large basis close-coupling calculation of scattering at low energies. The phase shifts of these calculations are lower than the present results given in Table 2.…”
Section: Introductioncontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…The problem ofH formation has been tackled using several approaches. Most widely used approach is based on close coupling approximation (CCA) method (see [11][12][13][14][15]). SinceH formation is a three particle charge-exchange collision problem so Faddeev's equation which in principle should be used for such problems, were also used [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The D-wave cross section ͓12,14,15͔ for Ps formation computed using the Kohn variational method converges more slowly with respect to the number of linear parameters than the S and P waves and is believed to be within 10% of the exact value. Extensive two-center close-coupling calculations have been performed, for instance, an 18-state calculation by McAlinden et al ͓16͔ and Kernoghan et al ͓17͔, a 33-state calculation by Kernoghan et al ͓18͔,and 20,21, and 28-state calculations by Mitroy and collaborators ͓19-21͔. Gien ͓22͔ has employed the Harris-Nesbet method using a wave function that is comprised of the 1s, 2s, 2p, and 3p state of hydrogen and positronium together with al-gebraic Hylleraas correlation functions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%