1979
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-81316-0_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positrons in Imperfect Solids: Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
28
0

Year Published

1987
1987
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
2
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such assertion can be deduced from the experimental results and ab-initio calculations of positron lifetimes obtained in similar materials. From the experimental point of view, it is well-known that positron lifetime in pure well-annealed Mg is above of 230 ps [7]. This value is in excellent agreement with that obtained by ab-initio calculations (details are given in Ref.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…Such assertion can be deduced from the experimental results and ab-initio calculations of positron lifetimes obtained in similar materials. From the experimental point of view, it is well-known that positron lifetime in pure well-annealed Mg is above of 230 ps [7]. This value is in excellent agreement with that obtained by ab-initio calculations (details are given in Ref.…”
supporting
confidence: 84%
“…For the metals the acoustic longitudinal phonon scattering dominates, and its contribution can be calculated using the deformation-potential approximation (Bardeen and Shockley, 1950) The decomposition of the positron lifetime spectrum is explained by the trapping model (Bertolaccini et al , 1971;Brandt, 1974) (West, 1979) 1. It is generally accepted that the trapping coe%cients for vacancies in metals are of the order of 10' -10' s (Nieminen and Manninen, 1979;West, 1979 Hodges (1970).…”
Section: Fig 4 Transmission Probabilities For Positrons and Electronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aim of this review is to update the series of earlier general summaries of positron theory (Nieminen and Manninen, 1979;Nieminen, 1983},which (a) vacancy in fcc Ni; (b) vacancy in Si with diamond structure; (c) divacancy in Si. The calculations were performed using the superimposed-atom method (Puska and Nieminen, 1983a).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should, however, be noted that the binding energy of a positron in a Li monovacancy is too low to cause trapping. [49][50][51] Neither positron lifetime nor 1D-ACAR measurements in the alkali metals have indicated evidence of trapping by vacancies. 52,53 Future investigations including measurements at low temperature to reduce the thermal generation of vacancies are necessary to accurately quantify the fraction of annihilations in Li vacancies and to identify the type of vacancies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%