2011
DOI: 10.1029/2011eo220001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Positrons observed to originate from thunderstorms

Abstract: Thunderstorms are the result of warm, moist air moving rapidly upward, then cooling and condensing. Electrification occurs within thunderstorms (as noted by Benjamin Franklin), produced primarily by frictional processes among ice particles. This leads to lightning discharges; the types, intensities, and rates of these discharges vary greatly among thunderstorms. Even though scientists have been studying lightning since Franklin's time, new phenomena associated with thunderstorms are still being discovered. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 5b we keep the relative sensitivity fixed at X = 2.7 and let the daily TGF detection rate ( Y ) vary from 1 to 6. The daily TGF detection rate for RHESSI is fairly well established by Grefenstette et al [2009], while Fermi's daily detection rate is given as approximately 1 [ Fishman , 2011]. As described above, based on the information given by Briggs [2011, also personal communication, 2011] we found that the equivalent (to RHESSI) daily detection rate for Fermi after downloading data, due to sensitivity differences only, is 1.5 ± 0.3 TGFs/day, with 1.2 (1.8) TGFs/day corresponding to TGFs with higher (lower) fluence over ocean than land.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 5b we keep the relative sensitivity fixed at X = 2.7 and let the daily TGF detection rate ( Y ) vary from 1 to 6. The daily TGF detection rate for RHESSI is fairly well established by Grefenstette et al [2009], while Fermi's daily detection rate is given as approximately 1 [ Fishman , 2011]. As described above, based on the information given by Briggs [2011, also personal communication, 2011] we found that the equivalent (to RHESSI) daily detection rate for Fermi after downloading data, due to sensitivity differences only, is 1.5 ± 0.3 TGFs/day, with 1.2 (1.8) TGFs/day corresponding to TGFs with higher (lower) fluence over ocean than land.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the first 53 TGFs measured by Fermi they observed 0.03 TGFs/day when a 16 ms on‐board trigger window was applied to the NaI scintillators, which increased to 0.3 TGFs/day when the same window was applied to the BGO detectors [ Fishman et al , 2011]. However, after the Fermi team started downloading most of the data obtained over regions where TGFs are produced, Fishman [2011] reported that more than 1 TGF/day has been observed. According to Briggs [2011; M. Briggs, personal communication, 2011] their ground search found 234 TGFs in 591.8 hours of data over regions which are expected to have a high TGF rate.…”
Section: Differences In Sensitivity and Total Number Of Observed Tgfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such technologies require a detailed understanding of positron collision processes to improve their accuracy and reliability. Positron collisions with atoms and molecules can also help in resolving a number of fundamental problems such as unknown sources of positron jets in the center of our galaxy [3], the missing antimatter [4], spectroscopic and gravitational properties of antimatter [5,6] and very recent observations of positron clouds produced during thunderstorms [7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%