2016
DOI: 10.3765/plsa.v1i0.3735
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possessor extraction in Indonesian-type languages

Abstract: Abstract. This paper examines possessor extraction in three Indonesian-type languages: Indonesian, Javanese and Madurese. I show that possessor extraction patterns are best captured under an analysis in which the possessor undergoes movement from an internal possession structure to the left periphery of the clause; the possessum remains in an A position, while the possessor occurs in an A' position. Possessor movement is subject to general constraints on DP movement in each of these languages, and the voice sy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Yucatec Mayan is not the only language that does not fulfil the predictions of the subject island condition. Possessor extraction out of subjects/objects but not out of adjuncts is reported for Italian (Longobardi 1991: 74), Indonesian and Javanese (Jeoung 2016: 7), and XPs can be extracted from nominatives/accusatives but not from genitives/datives in German (Fanselow 1988: 102); see the cross-linguistic overview in Stepanov (2007). The key to understanding these facts seems to be that subjects appearing in relatively low positions in the clause (e.g.…”
Section: Possessors and Related Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yucatec Mayan is not the only language that does not fulfil the predictions of the subject island condition. Possessor extraction out of subjects/objects but not out of adjuncts is reported for Italian (Longobardi 1991: 74), Indonesian and Javanese (Jeoung 2016: 7), and XPs can be extracted from nominatives/accusatives but not from genitives/datives in German (Fanselow 1988: 102); see the cross-linguistic overview in Stepanov (2007). The key to understanding these facts seems to be that subjects appearing in relatively low positions in the clause (e.g.…”
Section: Possessors and Related Categoriesmentioning
confidence: 99%