2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00778-016-0430-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible and certain keys for SQL

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is particularly appealing to our keys since the experiments in Section 6 confirm that i) key sets for which Armstrong tables do not exist are rare, and ii) keys that represent real application semantics can be enforced efficiently in SQL database systems. Our findings illustrate the impact of nulls on the theory of Armstrong databases, and have revealed a technical error in previous research [29], see Section B of the appendix in the technical report [27].…”
Section: Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 58%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is particularly appealing to our keys since the experiments in Section 6 confirm that i) key sets for which Armstrong tables do not exist are rare, and ii) keys that represent real application semantics can be enforced efficiently in SQL database systems. Our findings illustrate the impact of nulls on the theory of Armstrong databases, and have revealed a technical error in previous research [29], see Section B of the appendix in the technical report [27].…”
Section: Structural Characterizationsupporting
confidence: 58%
“…While Armstrong tables are claimed to exist for any set of weak/strong FDs [29], we discovered a technical error in the proof. Indeed, in the technical report [27], Example 15 on page 42 shows a set of strong and weak FDs for which no Armstrong table exists.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One or two dimensions alone are inadequate to capture an accurate and complete picture of the overall data quality, which can span a large number of dimensions (Jayawardene et al 2013b). Additionally, these solutions are generally underpinned by assumptions relating to the availability of significant meta-data [e.g., data distributions (Dasu and Johnson 2003), thresholds (Song and Chen 2011) and probabilities (Köhler et al 2015)], which may not be readily available for open or repurposed datasets.…”
Section: )mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, in the case of medical data, it might be discovered that carcinogenicity depends functionally from a set of attributes. Since the problem of discovering the complete set of FDs for a given relation is P-hard [23], each approach performs different strategies to minimize, as much as possible, the necessary computations. The proposed approaches can be grouped in two main categories, the top-down approaches and the bottomup approaches.…”
Section: Discovering Keys and Fds In Relational Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%