2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.04.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible effect of solar tides on radon signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
44
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further insight on the issue was recently gained by experimental simulation of radon signals in confined volumes of air [29]. In contrast to the expectation, the results demonstrate nuclear radiation patterns that are non-uniform in space and in time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Further insight on the issue was recently gained by experimental simulation of radon signals in confined volumes of air [29]. In contrast to the expectation, the results demonstrate nuclear radiation patterns that are non-uniform in space and in time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…These reports, along with the observation of a change in the decay rate of 54 Mn during a solar flare suggest the possibility of a direct solar influence on nuclear decay rates through an as yet unknown mechanism. Periodicities and other "non-random" behaviors have been reported in the decays of 3 H (Falkenberg 2001;Lobashev et al 1999;Veprev and Muromtsev 2012), 32 Si, 36 Cl (Alburger et al 1986;Javorsek II et al 2010;Sturrock et al 2010aSturrock et al , 2011aJenkins et al 2012), 54 Mn (Jenkins et al 2011), 56 Mn (Ellis 1990), 60 Co (Baurov et al 2007;Parkhomov 2010b,a), 90 Sr (Parkhomov 2010b,a;Sturrock et al 2012b), 137 Cs (Baurov et al 2007), 152 Eu (Siegert et al 1998), 222 Rn (and/or its daughters) (Steinitz et al 2011;Sturrock et al 2012a), and 226 Ra (and/or its daughters) (Siegert et al 1998;Javorsek II et al 2010;Sturrock et al 2010bSturrock et al , 2011aFischbach et al 2009). Since these fluctuations have been seen by groups located at various sites employing different detector technologies (e.g., gas, scintillation, solid state), it is unlikely that they can all be attributed to temperature, pressure, humidity or other "environmental" influences on the detector systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nature of the physical processes driving the temporal patterns observed in 222 Rn time series is not clear, particularly the extent to which environmental parameters, such as temperature, atmospheric pressure, and humidity, can influence the 222 Rn level [2,3]. To help understand these processes, Steinitz et al have carried out experiments that track the variation of alpha and gamma radiation arising from a source of 222 Rn in a closed volume of air [4]. In this article, we analyze a sequence of 28,733 measurements of gamma radiation acquired in this experiment over the time interval 28 January 2007 to 10 May 2010.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%