1983
DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014627
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible functions of the interhemispheric connexions between visual cortical areas in the cat.

Abstract: (1975). Orientation-and direction-selectivity, as well as the responsiveness of the population of neurones, seemed unaltered. The reduction in binocularity was much less convincing for cells in the body of area 17, even very close to the callosal-recipient zone. 3. Reversible cooling of the 17/18 border had no effect on the few cells recorded outside the callosal zone in the other hemisphere nor on eighteen of the thirty-five cells recorded in the callosal zone. However, in ten cells the receptive field disapp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
51
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
51
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We have shown here a significant reduction in cortical activity after silencing of the contralateral side. This is consistent with previous studies in cats indicating that callosal projections provide a kind of general sustaining input to the contralateral hemisphere (Blakemore et al, 1983;Yinon et al, 1992). This activity deprivation might explain the impaired cortical development on the side contralateral to BoNT/E injection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…We have shown here a significant reduction in cortical activity after silencing of the contralateral side. This is consistent with previous studies in cats indicating that callosal projections provide a kind of general sustaining input to the contralateral hemisphere (Blakemore et al, 1983;Yinon et al, 1992). This activity deprivation might explain the impaired cortical development on the side contralateral to BoNT/E injection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…IPSI, Ipsilateral eye; CONTRA, contralateral eye. ularity in both cats (Payne et al, 1980;Blakemore et al, 1983;Diao et al, 1983;Yinon et al, 1992) and rats Restani et al, 2009), mostly in layers 2/3 and 5 (Payne et al, 1984). In line with this view, 5NPs, which project to contralateral V1 (Hallman et al, 1988;Kasper et al, 1994), were almost solely driven by the contralateral eye.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…For most cortical areas they are restricted to the projection of the vertical meridian. The receptive field of callosal recipient neurones is made of two areas juxtaposed at the vertical meridian, one provided by the direct LGN input and the other by the callosal input (Berlucchi & Rizzolatti, 1968;Blakemore, Diao, Pu, Wang & Xiao, 1983;Antonini, Berlucchi & Lepore, 1983;Antonini, Di Stefano, Minciacchi & Tassinari, 1985). In addition non-linear interactions between the direct and the callosal input have been described in single cortical neurones of split-chiasm cats (Berardi, Bisti & Maffei, 1984).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%