1970
DOI: 10.1530/jrf.0.0230375
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible Immunological Basis for a Reduction of Fertility in Cross-Mating Fowl With Japanese Quail

Abstract: Summary. Female quail from populations selected for high interspecific fertility when bred with fowl were inseminated half-weekly with fowl semen for periods up to 18 consecutive weeks. At the end of that time, all birds showed a decline in interspecific fertility and the blood plasma of approximately half of the female quail contained antibodies against fowl spermatozoa. The interspecific fertility of these birds was considerably less than that of the birds which did not have antibodies.In a second experiment… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

1975
1975
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, corroborating the potential importance of previous exposure to heterospecific sperm, recent work in nonhybridizing passerine species and populations shows no evidence of cryptic female discrimination against heterospecific sperm (Cramer et al 2014(Cramer et al , 2016. Mechanistically, we suggest that this plastic response by females could be related to the immune system, as female immune responses to sperm are known in a number of taxa, including humans (Clarke 2009;Morrow and Innocenti 2012), and birds artificially inseminated with heterospecific sperm (Haley and Abplanalp 1970). Moreover, differences in the antigenicity of sperm surface proteins have been implicated in the reduced ability of turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) sperm to cross chicken (Gallus domesticus) vaginas following artificial insemination Wishart 1992, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, corroborating the potential importance of previous exposure to heterospecific sperm, recent work in nonhybridizing passerine species and populations shows no evidence of cryptic female discrimination against heterospecific sperm (Cramer et al 2014(Cramer et al , 2016. Mechanistically, we suggest that this plastic response by females could be related to the immune system, as female immune responses to sperm are known in a number of taxa, including humans (Clarke 2009;Morrow and Innocenti 2012), and birds artificially inseminated with heterospecific sperm (Haley and Abplanalp 1970). Moreover, differences in the antigenicity of sperm surface proteins have been implicated in the reduced ability of turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) sperm to cross chicken (Gallus domesticus) vaginas following artificial insemination Wishart 1992, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…, ). Mechanistically, we suggest that this plastic response by females could be related to the immune system, as female immune responses to sperm are known in a number of taxa, including humans (Clarke ; Morrow and Innocenti ), and birds artificially inseminated with heterospecific sperm (Haley and Abplanalp ). Moreover, differences in the antigenicity of sperm surface proteins have been implicated in the reduced ability of turkey ( Meleagris gallopavo ) sperm to cross chicken ( Gallus domesticus ) vaginas following artificial insemination (Steele and Wishart , ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, experimental injection of testicular material into hens depresses the fertility of females for the following 12-67 days (McCartney, 1923). This response to sperm exposure is associated with rising levels of sperm antibodies in blood plasma and specifically in serum levels of sperm agglutinins, which modulate sperm agglutination in vitro (Hosoda, Abe, & Otsuka, 1964;Wentworth & Mellen, 1963; see Haley &Abplanalp, 1970 andBurke, Rieser, &Shoffner, 1971 for similar patterns in turkeys, Meleagris gallopavo, and Japanese quails, Coturnix japonica, respectively). However, it remains unclear whether these same patterns of agglutination occur in vivo, or whether agglutination harms sperm success.…”
Section: Female Reproductive Tract Immunity Effects On Sperm Successmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This stochastic phenotype is alternatively explained by the difference in the number of sperms that reach infundibulum in each fertilization event: if a sufficient number of sperm enter into eggs, the eggs are activated and subsequently develop normally; otherwise, embryos are arrested during the early stage. Anti-sperm immunoreaction in the female tract, which may disturb sperm storage in the oviduct, is a proposed cause of failure of fertilization in interspecific hybridization 21 55 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%