“…This idea is borne out for a model of non-syndromic ID, the Gdi1-null mouse, which did not show the expected cognitive impairment when housed in mildly enriched environments but only when housing was a mildly impoverished environment (Bianchi et al, 2009;D'Adamo et al, 2014;De Giorgio, 2017). This may be explained by the neurobiology of the Gdi1-null mutant that curtails the benefit it can get from environmental enrichment, in spite of an increased number of dendritic spines this environment elicits in the brain (Correa et al, 2012;Daumas et al, 2017;Hunter et al, 2017): In Gdi1-null mice the presynaptic recycling of glutamatergic vesicles remains time-limited, hence the beneficial effects of enrichment remain curtailed and ineffective on some sustained tasks (Bianchi et al, 2009;D'Adamo et al, 2014;Ezaki and Nakakihara, 2012;More et al, 2017;Strobl-Wildemann et al, 2011). Finally, it is important to note that the proposed outcomes of this model also would be influenced by the age at which enrichment began, and the duration of exposure.…”