1985
DOI: 10.1016/0300-9629(85)90036-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible monocular range-finding mechanisms in stomatopods from different environmental light conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a column across the mb, om are not all perpendicular to the cornea but are arranged in a characteristic skewing pattern ( Fig. 4a, b, e, f) which depends on the size of the animal, the species and the amount of light available in the environment (Schiff et al, 1985;Schiff, 1989a;Schiff & Di Stefano, 1992;Marshall & Land, 1993a). In turn, this skewing pattern determines a pattern of visual fields which in some areas strongly overlap and in others are separated by blind regions (Schiff et al, 1986c).…”
Section: Shallow Subtidal Environmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a column across the mb, om are not all perpendicular to the cornea but are arranged in a characteristic skewing pattern ( Fig. 4a, b, e, f) which depends on the size of the animal, the species and the amount of light available in the environment (Schiff et al, 1985;Schiff, 1989a;Schiff & Di Stefano, 1992;Marshall & Land, 1993a). In turn, this skewing pattern determines a pattern of visual fields which in some areas strongly overlap and in others are separated by blind regions (Schiff et al, 1986c).…”
Section: Shallow Subtidal Environmentmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Skewing is stronger in species from dim than in those from bright habitats (Schiff, 1989a). Thus stomatopod species from dim light habitats show more overlap of visual fields than those from bright habitats (Schiff et al, 1985;Schiff, 1987Schiff, , 1989a. Skewing patterns as well as the size of om change with growth in such a way that the distance of a critical region for prey capture matches the lengths of the raptorial appendages (Schiff etal., 1989a, b).…”
Section: Shallow Subtidal Environmentmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The first two ventral rows of skewed ommatidia form an angle (towards the middle band) of 71° and 78°, respectively, looking upward. Optical axes cross those of the middle band and of the other half of the eye, as in all stomatopods (Schiff et al, 1985). Towards the tips of the eyes skewing decreases, but most ommatidia in the dorsal half look downward.…”
Section: Optical Axesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ommatidia next to the middle band are always skewed and their optical axes cross those of the middle band and of the other side (Schiff et al, 1985). This means that many visual fields are superimposed, while in other regions of the eye blind regions separate visual fields (Iacino et al, 1990).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The skewing pattern (Abbott et al 1984;Schiff et al 1985) of ommatidia causes complex neural input patterns, different for different distances and positions of a target and for different species (Schiff and Candone 1986;Schiff et al 1986b;Schiff and Abbott 1989). Assuming a Gaussian-shaped graded potential (Goetz 1965;Snyder 1979) as the angular sensitivity function of a retinular cell, this potential would be transferred to the neurocartridge in the lamina.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%