2009
DOI: 10.1002/syn.20631
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible relationship between the stress‐induced synaptic response and metaplasticity in the hippocampal CA1 field of freely moving rats

Abstract: Hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) is suppressed not only by stress paradigms but also by low frequency stimulation (LFS) prior to LTP-inducing high frequency stimulation (HFS; tetanus), termed metaplasticity. These synaptic responses are dependent on N-methyl-D-aspartate receptors, leading to speculations about the possible relationship between metaplasticity and stress-induced LTP impairment. However, the functional significance of metaplasticity has been unclear. The present study elucidated the elect… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, CFC stress robustly induced c-Fos expression in all DRN subdivisions examined, and this was significantly suppressed by diazepam. Considering higher plasma corticosterone concentrations induced by CFC stress than OF stress (Hirata et al, 2008;Hirata et al, 2009), the different neuronal responses between the two tests might be related to different types and intensities of stressors. While exposing animals to an OF arena drives the motivation of novelty-seeking behavior on one hand, it also increases the anxiety on the other hand, because of the novelty of unfamiliar environments (Gray and McNaughton, 2003;Padilla et al, 2010;Molander et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, CFC stress robustly induced c-Fos expression in all DRN subdivisions examined, and this was significantly suppressed by diazepam. Considering higher plasma corticosterone concentrations induced by CFC stress than OF stress (Hirata et al, 2008;Hirata et al, 2009), the different neuronal responses between the two tests might be related to different types and intensities of stressors. While exposing animals to an OF arena drives the motivation of novelty-seeking behavior on one hand, it also increases the anxiety on the other hand, because of the novelty of unfamiliar environments (Gray and McNaughton, 2003;Padilla et al, 2010;Molander et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These synaptic changes mimicked those induced by LFS prior to tetanus; LFS application prior to tetanus caused enhancement of LTP in DG, whereas it suppressed LTP in the CA1 field (20). Synaptic metaplasticity in the CA1 field (i.e., LTP suppression by LFS application prior to tetanus) is considered to serve as a cellular mechanism of stress experience-dependent fear memory (20,31,35). Therefore, LFS-primed synaptic changes in the hippocampal subregions appear to reflect one aspect of responses to CFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…CA1 field was impaired by BLA activation (7,32) and CFS (33,34), the present data strengthen the findings that stress exposure, in addition to BLA activation, has opposing effects on synaptic plasticity in a hippocampal subregion-specific manner. These synaptic changes mimicked those induced by LFS prior to tetanus; LFS application prior to tetanus caused enhancement of LTP in DG, whereas it suppressed LTP in the CA1 field (20). Synaptic metaplasticity in the CA1 field (i.e., LTP suppression by LFS application prior to tetanus) is considered to serve as a cellular mechanism of stress experience-dependent fear memory (20,31,35).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The suppression of LTP in the CA1 field was caused not only by stress paradigms but also by low-frequency stimulation (LFS) prior to LTP-inducing high frequency stimulation (tetanus), termed metaplasticity (7,8). This homosynaptic metaplasticity appears to reflect one aspect of hippocampal function in the mediation of responses to stress because of the similar electrophysiological (9, 10) and neurochemical (11) profiles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%