2023
DOI: 10.15585/mmwr.mm7209a3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Possible Undetected Mpox Infection Among Persons Accessing Homeless Services and Staying in Encampments — San Francisco, California, October–November 2022

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite concerns that some cases could be undetected (particularly in the MSM community), potentially preventing outbreak control, the serologic survey identified only 1.3% of MSM patients at high risk for mpox without a known mpox diagnosis who had orthopoxvirus IgM, indicating recent exposure to mpox. That rate of IgM positivity is similar to the 1.4% rate among persons experiencing homelessness in San Francisco during July–October 2022 ( 11 ). Mpox was retrospectively detected by PCR in 5.6% of lesion swab samples obtained across the country, suggesting that mpox was probably undiagnosed in a small subset of symptomatic patients during the height of the mpox outbreak in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Despite concerns that some cases could be undetected (particularly in the MSM community), potentially preventing outbreak control, the serologic survey identified only 1.3% of MSM patients at high risk for mpox without a known mpox diagnosis who had orthopoxvirus IgM, indicating recent exposure to mpox. That rate of IgM positivity is similar to the 1.4% rate among persons experiencing homelessness in San Francisco during July–October 2022 ( 11 ). Mpox was retrospectively detected by PCR in 5.6% of lesion swab samples obtained across the country, suggesting that mpox was probably undiagnosed in a small subset of symptomatic patients during the height of the mpox outbreak in the United States.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…In a historically marginalized population that experiences multiple barriers to healthcare, it is probable that not all PEH with mpox symptoms received the necessary medical attention for diagnosis and treatment. A serosurvey conducted by CDC among 209 persons experiencing homelessness found 3 possible missed cases of mpox ( 23 ), suggesting a small, but present, negative case detection bias from mpox surveillance based on case reporting. This bias may also have affected LACDPH’s assessment of transmission within shelters and encampments, particularly because contact tracing is more challenging among PEH than among the general population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the infectivity and duration of viral shedding were not evaluated in asymptomatic cases, thereby limiting our understanding of the role of asymptomatic persons in MPXV transmission. Finally, the study did not use MPXV antibody testing because of the low specificity of currently available modalities ( 12 , 13 ); thus, we might have missed additional asymptomatic mpox cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%