Post-9/11 Veterans and Their Partners Improve Mental Health Outcomes with a Self-directed Mobile and Web-based Wellness Training Program: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

BackgroundVeterans with history of deployment in the Global War on Terror face significant and ongoing challenges with high prevalences of adverse psychological, physical, spiritual, and family impacts. Together, these challenges contribute to an emerging public health crisis likely to extend well into the future. Innovative approaches are needed that reach veterans and their family members with strategies they can employ over time in their daily lives to promote improved adjustment and well-being.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to evaluate effects of use of a Web-based, self-directed program of instruction in mind- and body-based wellness skills to be employed by Global War on Terror veterans and their significant relationship partners on mental health and wellness outcomes associated with postdeployment readjustment.MethodsWe recruited 160 veteran-partner dyads in 4 regions of the United States (San Diego, CA; Dallas, TX; Fayetteville, NC; and New York, NY) through publicity by the Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America to its membership. Dyads were randomly allocated to 1 of 4 study arms: Mission Reconnect (MR) program alone, MR plus the Prevention and Relationship Enhancement Program (PREP) for Strong Bonds weekend program for military couples, PREP alone, and waitlist control. We administered a battery of standardized and investigator-generated instruments assessing mental health outcomes at baseline, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks. Dyads in the MR arms were provided Web-based and mobile app video and audio instruction in a set of mindfulness-related stress reduction and contemplative practices, as well as partner massage for reciprocal use. All participants provided weekly reports on frequency and duration of self-care practices for the first 8 weeks, and at 16 weeks.ResultsDuring the first 8-week reporting period, veterans and partners assigned to MR arms used some aspect of the program a mean of 20 times per week, totaling nearly 2.5 hours per week, with only modest declines in use at 16 weeks. Significant improvements were seen at 8 and 16 weeks in measures of posttraumatic stress disorder, depression, sleep quality, perceived stress, resilience, self-compassion, and pain for participants assigned to MR arms. In addition, significant reductions in self-reported levels of pain, tension, irritability, anxiety, and depression were associated with use of partner massage.ConclusionsBoth veterans and partners were able to learn and make sustained use of a range of wellness practices taught in the MR program. Home-based, self-directed interventions may be of particular service to veterans who are distant from, averse to, or prohibited by schedule from using professional services. Leveraging the partner relationship may enhance sustained use of self-directed interventions for this population. Use of the MR program appears to be an accessible, low-cost approach that supports well-being and reduces multiple symptoms among post-9/11 veterans and their partners.Trial RegistrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT01680419; htt...

The efficacy of smartphone‐based mental health interventions for depressive symptoms: a meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials

“…Mean sample ages ranged from 18 to 59 years (median 39 years). All but two studies 32,34 used some indication of mental health issues as inclusion criteria. For clinical populations, two studies Computer-aided training on how to use the apps; participants were also allocated a coach to help with app usage HADS recruited people with major depression 36,43 , two individuals with bipolar disorder 28,30 , one young people in primary care with any mental health condition 40 .…”

“…Depressive symptoms were measured as a primary outcome in 12 studies, and as a secondary outcome in six. The following tools were used: the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale 44 depression subscale in three studies 29,39,40 ; the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression scale 45 in four 31,32,38,41 ; the Beck Depression Inventory II 46 in three 34,36,43 ; the Patient Health Questionnaire 47 in six 26,27,33,35,42,43 ; the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression 48 in one 30 ; the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale 49 in one 37 ; and the Montgomery-Å sberg Depression Rating Scale 50 in one 28 .…”

Body‐ and Movement‐Oriented Interventions for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis

“…Outcome measures were self-report measures for PTSD symptomatology as well as PTSD measures collected during clinical interviews; one study used a clinician-administered measure of complex traumatic stress (Kaiser et al, 2010). The designs were RCTs (n = 12; Carter et al, 2013;Jindani et al, 2015;Kahn et al, 2016;Kaiser et al, 2010;Kim et al, 2013;Mitchell et al, 2014;Nakamura et al, 2011Nakamura et al, , 2017Price, 2005;Rosenbaum et al, 2014;Van der Kolk et al, 2014), nonrandomized controlled studies (n = 3; Descilo et al, 2009;Hoekenga et al, 2009;Thordardottir et al, 2014), and single-group studies (as already mentioned earlier). Detailed study characteristics are presented in Supplementary Table S1.…”

The Use of Technology to Augment Clinical Care in Depression and Anxiety Disorders: An Evidence Map

“…We also evaluated the applicability of the identified body of literature to the military health system. The study populations in the included studies were primarily civilians, with only nine of the studies documenting a military population (Luxton et al, 2016;Stetz et al, 2011;Ruskin, 2004;Pyne et al, 2010;Mohr et al, 2005;Mohr et al, 2011;Kahn, Collinge, and Soltysik, 2016;Fortney et al, 2007;Egede et al, 2015). Of these military studies, seven were treating depression, one anxiety, and one was transdiagnostic.…”