2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.sse.2012.07.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-annealing effect on the interface morphology and current efficiency of organic light-emitting diodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, the device's efficiency was significantly reduced and operating voltages increased by heating at 70 °C in high vacuum for 3 h, as shown in table 4. Such thermal degradations were completely avoided with the 60 °C ALD process: as also shown in table 4, upon the application of a 35 nm AZO film deposited with the 60 °C/H 2 O 2 process, the OLED device did not show any degradation on its OLED spectrum (shown in figure S7), but instead had moderate improvements in its efficiencies, which were likely attributable to improved interface quality by the annealing effects of the 60 °C thermal treatment, as reported previously [33,34]. The encapsulation effectiveness of the AZO film in terms of the lifetime of the encapsulated devices, however, could not be accurately evaluated, because the OLED devices did not have adequate intrinsic stability to allow for long-term lifetime tests.…”
Section: Encapsulation Of Oled Devicessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For instance, the device's efficiency was significantly reduced and operating voltages increased by heating at 70 °C in high vacuum for 3 h, as shown in table 4. Such thermal degradations were completely avoided with the 60 °C ALD process: as also shown in table 4, upon the application of a 35 nm AZO film deposited with the 60 °C/H 2 O 2 process, the OLED device did not show any degradation on its OLED spectrum (shown in figure S7), but instead had moderate improvements in its efficiencies, which were likely attributable to improved interface quality by the annealing effects of the 60 °C thermal treatment, as reported previously [33,34]. The encapsulation effectiveness of the AZO film in terms of the lifetime of the encapsulated devices, however, could not be accurately evaluated, because the OLED devices did not have adequate intrinsic stability to allow for long-term lifetime tests.…”
Section: Encapsulation Of Oled Devicessupporting
confidence: 73%
“…As such, the accelerated testing process could lead to the OLEDs appearing to have shorter lifetimes than they might actually possess during normal operation. It is logical to consider that degradation of OLED performance under thermal stress could be related to the glass-transition temperatures ( T g ’s) of the materials in the active layers, , and consequently, there have been substantial efforts to develop high- T g compounds. There are now a number of reports using different techniques that indicate that the drop in device performance is morphologically driven; that is, that the layered structure is altered during heating. Changes in the layered structure of the device can lead to an imbalance in the injection and transport of charges, resulting in less exciton formation and radiative decay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electroluminescent (EL) efficiency of such devices depends on many factors, including the active layer quantum yield, the recombination and transport properties as well as the device architecture and engineering of electrodes and interfaces [ 4 , 5 ]. High quality interfaces are very important in OLED applications to achieve efficient charge injection and avoid low dielectric breakdown voltage and dark spot formation [ 6 , 7 ]. The injection efficiency of holes from the most widely used indium tin oxide (ITO)/Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene):poly(styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS) hole injection electrode (HIE) [ 8 ], strongly depends on the energy level alignment between the PEDOT:PSS/organic active layer [ 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 ] and the interfacial morphology between the various layers (e.g., ITO, PEDOT:PSS, organic active layer) [ 15 , 16 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%