Post-collisional magmatism and ore-forming systems in the Menderes massif: new constraints from the Miocene porphyry Mo–Cu Pınarbaşı system, Gediz–Kütahya, western Turkey

Abstract

Citation for published item:heli sD yF nd woritzD F nd ghirdiD wF nd elyD hF nd linovD eF nd evnD wFuF @PHIUA 9ostEollisionl mgmtism nd oreEforming systems in the wenderes mssif X new onstrints from the wioene porphyry wo!gu %nr s% systemD qediz!u¤ uthyD western urkeyF9D winerlium depositFD SP @VAF ppF IISUEIIUVF Further information on publisher's website: The nal publication is available at Springer via https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-016-0711-7 Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.

Magmatic sulfides in high-potassium calc-alkaline to shoshonitic and alkaline rocks

“…They have been divided into three regions (Fig. 2b, c): (i) the Konya region, for which both subduction (Doglioni et al, 2002(Doglioni et al, , 2009Innocenti et al, 2005) and post-subduction (Pe-Piper and Piper, 2001;Dilek and Altunkaynak, 2007) geodynamic regimes have been suggested, is taken here to represent a post-subduction geodynamic regime as supported by recent evidence presented by Rabayrol et al (2019); (ii) the Usak-Güre basin, including three volcanic centres (Elmadag, Itecektepe and Beydagi), corresponds to a post-subduction, locally extensional setting (Prelević et al, 2012;Ersoy et al, 2010); and (iii) the Kula volcanic field results from asthenospheric upwelling associated with extension in a postsubduction setting (Tokçaer et al, 2005;Alici et al, 2002).…”

“…This implies a short residence time in the crust, which in turn explains the minimum crustal contamination (e.g. Dilek and Altunkaynak, 2007;Alici et al, 2002) and the mafic rock composition.…”

Global Occurrence, Geology and Characteristics of Hydrothermal-Origin Kaolin Deposits

“…All of these geological features provided suitable environments for the deposition of Au and kaolin-group minerals in western Anatolia. Miocene precious ore deposits in western Turkey are known to be formed by the following process: Cinarpinar porphyry Cu-Au-Mo system, the porphyry Mo-Cu Pinarbaşi system in the Menderes massif [191], the low-sulfidation Kısacık, Küçükdere and Ovacık Au-Ag deposits, and the IS to LS Efemcukuru Au deposit [192,193]. The richness of the ore minerals makes all of these quarries different from other mines.…”

Metallogeny of the Tethyan Orogenic Belt: From Mesozoic Magmatic Arcs to Cenozoic Back-Arc and Postcollisional Settings in Southeast Europe, Anatolia, and the Lesser Caucasus: An Introduction

“…The Cenozoic ore deposits include porphyry Au-Cu(-Mo) deposits, carbonate replacement and skarn deposits, vein-type and breccia-type high-to lowsulfidation epithermal systems with base and/or precious metals, and sedimentary rock-hosted epithermal Au deposits. They are linked to extensional tectonics, particularly exhumation of metamorphic core complexes and low-angle detachment faults, and are preferentially associated with high-K calc-alkaline to shoshonitic magmatism (e.g., Marchev et al, 2005;Márton et al, 2010;Bonsall et al, 2011;Yig it, 2012;Berger et al, 2013;Kaiser Rohrmeier et al, 2013;Sánchez et al, 2016;Siron et al, 2016Siron et al, , 2018Smith et al, 2016;Delibaş et al, 2017;Melfos and Voudouris, 2017;Voudouris et al, 2019). The ore deposits become progressively younger from the northern Rhodope massif in Bulgaria and Greece to the southern Aegean region.…”