2020
DOI: 10.1177/0143831x19894380
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Post-crisis precarity: Understanding attitudes to work and industrial relations among young people in the UK

Abstract: The 2008 crisis crystallised the trend towards ‘precarious’ labour market conditions which disproportionately affect young people. Few studies since the crisis, however, examine how young people understand and engage with their economic circumstances and industrial relations. This article draws upon rich and original data from focus groups and an online community exercise to examine the attitudes of young people in relation to the apparent ‘normalisation’ of precarity in the post-crisis economy. It argues that… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Thomas had a degree and 7 different jobs in order to attempt to make a living, 5 of which were ZHCs. These findings corroborate the arguments that such employment is marked by low‐pay, job instability, insufficient and variable hours, as precarious work is becoming increasingly normalized (Berry & McDaniel, 2022; Rubery et al., 2018). This research reveals new features of precarization (see Alberti et al., 2018), where these workers needed to have multiple jobs due to constrained job availability and the proliferation of low‐pay, ZHCs, HVHs and outsourced work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, Thomas had a degree and 7 different jobs in order to attempt to make a living, 5 of which were ZHCs. These findings corroborate the arguments that such employment is marked by low‐pay, job instability, insufficient and variable hours, as precarious work is becoming increasingly normalized (Berry & McDaniel, 2022; Rubery et al., 2018). This research reveals new features of precarization (see Alberti et al., 2018), where these workers needed to have multiple jobs due to constrained job availability and the proliferation of low‐pay, ZHCs, HVHs and outsourced work.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The focus of our article is on employment precarity, and several scholars argue that the development of a ‘flexible’ deregulated labour market has created increasingly polarized employment (Clark et al., 2022; Green, 2006; Standing, 2011), with manifold inequalities experienced by those at the lower end of the labour market. This is marked by deep‐rooted structural issues of low‐pay, employment insecurity, ZHCs or variable working hours, and widespread precarity (Berry & McDaniel, 2022; Clark et al., 2022; Rubery et al., 2018). Alberti et al.…”
Section: The Employment Relationship Working Time and Precarious Zero...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Employment rate. Young people between 20 and 34 years old Source: EPA However, as of 2020, due to the crisis caused by Covid-19, a change in trend will predictably be seen again (Berry and McDaniel, 2020). Also, the events that are currently caused by the Ukraine war will produce changes in the world economic situation that will affect the labor market.…”
Section: Labor Employment Rate Of Young People In Spainmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a gap in the existing literature with regard to the relationship between workrelated behaviour and the economic context (Berry and McDaniel, 2022). Moreover, the impact of a disruptive event can be felt differently across people (Akkermans et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%